Subject: Re: necklaces
From: mccurdy@ucselx.sdsu.edu (mccurdy m)
Date: 1990-04-17, 12:03
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In article <13132@csli.Stanford.EDU> podlozny@csli.stanford.edu (Ann Podlozny) writes:
> >In article <1990Apr17.154025.29075@ucselx.sdsu.edu> mccurdy@ucselx.sdsu.edu (mccurdy m) writes:
>> >>I firmly believe that there is only one necklace. Having more than
>> >>one would serve no purpose in the story/plot. As to who dug it up, with the
> >
> >I don't necessarily agree; can the possibility that Laura gave half
> >hearts to all the guys she was sleeping with be ruled out?  Make 'em
> >think they're the one and only...she was pretty messed up...



That's a good point - I hadn't considered that. That would be a reason
within the plot to have more than one necklace; to indicate that Laura was
involved with all of these men and to further confuse the issue of who was
involved in the murder.

If the doctor did dig up his half, it must have beed that he was
out in the woods watching when the necklace was buried.

Mike McCurdy

-- Mike McCurdy * mccurdy@ucselx.sdsu.edu * Reality Modifications Inc. ************************** Dept. of Redundancy Dept. ** Drive less if at all ** 333 Inner Circle Square **************************