Subject: Re: Why the killer won't be revealed, maybe
From: rlr@toccata.rutgers.edu (Rich Rosen)
Date: 1990-05-06, 22:36
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In article <10848@shlump.nac.dec.com>, boyajian@ruby.dec.com (Cisco's Buddy)
writes:
> > } The very next line from Adam's article said something to the effect
> > } that "Also significant is the fact that 'Twin Peaks' and 'David Lynch'
> > } have the same number of letters... well, almost... I think this is VERY
> > } significant..."  Always check that parody bit, you know, before aiming
> > } and firing. :-)
> > 
> > What I noticed was after these two little bits was "but seriously..."
> > However, if the Truman bit was meant as a joke, the "sometime in the
> > late 1800's" part was excessive and unnecessary. If he'd left that out,
> > I would've taken the remark as a joke.

I see your point.  I would consider any date prior to 1907 to be excessive and
unnecessary, too.

Good thing we're not taking this too seriously... :-)
--
"I don't think what we're doing is wrong.""Why not?"
Rich Rosenrlr@toccata.rutgers.edu
--