Subject: Ben and Josie From: bobg+@andrew.cmu.edu (Robert Steven Glickstein) Date: 1990-05-11, 14:24 Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks Josie and Ben as co-conspirators: A Real Big Zinger. So far, most pairings/groups/associations-in-general have consisted of either all-good-guys or all-bad-guys (insofar as we're able to tell them apart). This rule seems to be violated only in marriage: Norma (good) married to Hank (bad). Shelly (good) married to Leo (bad). Sylvia (good) married to Ben (bad). (Note: Please take these "good" and "bad" estimations with a grain, nay, a rock of salt.) Given this observation, there are a few possible scenarios: 1) Josie is "good" This assumption is inconsistent to begin with. "Good" characters don't conspire, nor do they smoke (at least, not in Twin Peaks [this observation comes from Steve Webster]), nor do they await their co-conspirators secretly in a dark room. On the other hand, "good" characters can conspire for a good cause (James, Donna and Madeleine; Audrey and Donna). 1a) Ben is "bad" (and Josie is "good") This would seem to violate the observation. On the other hand, if their scheme is in their mutual best interests AND is intended to harm Catherine Martell, then this scenario is consistent with Josie being "good" (i.e., "bad" people get hurt [Catherine], "good" people benefit [herself, Pete?]). 1b) Ben is "good" (and Josie is "good") This would not violate the observation, except as described under 1), above. 2) Josie is "bad" This is inconsistent with Josie being friends with Pete Martell ("good"), unless Pete Martell is really "bad," which seems unlikely. It is also inconsistent with her being Truman("good")'s lover. On the other hand, Truman may be "bad," but again this seems unlikely. However, if Josie is in fact bad, this opens up a whole new box of donuts. What was really her association with Laura ("good-and-bad")? Was she, like Bobby, corrupted by Laura? Or was it the other way around? Was she responsible for Andrew Packard's death, to inherit the sawmill? Also, assuming Josie's "bad," what is Sheriff Truman hiding? He doesn't seem to be worried about being implicated in the Laura case. Perhaps he conspired with Josie to kill Andrew Packard, and now breathes easy since he closed the case himself long ago? (This wouldn't necessarily make him "bad." It depends on whether Andrew Packard was "bad" or "good.") 2a) Ben is "good" (and Josie is "bad") This one seems pretty far-fetched, but it is possible. In this case, Josie would have to be "very bad." "Very bad" basically means that you're in control of other "bad" people, or can bend basically "good" people (Ben, in this case) to your will. This doesn't seem too unlikely, given that she has some as-yet-undetermined relationship with Hank ("very bad," because he controls Leo). If Josie is "very bad," then Ben may simply be her pawn, and she is using him in some elaborate game with Catherine. However, if Ben is "good" and Josie is "bad," this violates the original observation (unless Ben has no choice but to be associated with Josie, for reasons unknown). Furthermore, the assumption that Ben is "good" is inconsistent with many things, most notably: His visits to One-Eyed Jack's; his apparently long-time association with Leo; his flippancy at seeing the murdered Bernard. 2b) Ben is "bad" (and Josie is "bad") This raises the possibility that Catherine is "good," and her desire to burn the mill stems from a knowledge that Josie is "bad." Not much can be said about this scenario except that it's not inconsistent with much except as noted under 2), above. Whew. Well, there's my analysis. No doubt next week will render it obsolete. But I don't mind. I'm a software engineer. I'm used to it. Ob. Twin Peaks: Remember "Josie and the Pussycats"? Remember Leo's truck's name? ______________ _____________________________ Bob Glickstein | Internet: bobg@andrew.cmu.edu Information Technology Center | Bitnet: bobg%andrew@cmuccvma.bitnet Carnegie Mellon University | UUCP: ...!harvard!andrew.cmu.edu!bobg Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 | (412) 268-6743 | Sinners can repent, but stupid is forever