Subject: Re: Conjectures and Questions (Twin Peaks)
From: news@cs.yale.edu (Usenet News)
Date: 1990-05-24, 15:22
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks,rec.arts.tv
Reply-to: jellinghaus-robert@yale.UUCP

In article <1990May24.174906.18924@alembic.acs.com> csu@alembic.acs.com (Dave Mack) writes:
> >While Ed may have a dilemma, the writers don't. Ed can't be one of the
> >"good guys" and still go after Norma. If they want to have a subplot
> >involving Hank, Ed, and Norma, Nadine has to go, and killing her off
> >this way is really the only clean way to do it - although if they'd
> >had Norma bump her off, it might have added an interesting twist to
> >things.

Um, you underestimate how ridiculous the writers could make things.  How
about this:  Nadine becomes an invalid, living at home... and then one
night Hank breaks in and holds Nadine hostage, leading to a confrontation
with Hank, Ed, Norma, and Nadine, in which all is revealed in front of
Nadine's horrified and uncomprehending eyes???

Aagh, _I'm_ definitely gonna keep watching next year....

> >Dave Mack


Rob Jellinghaus                | "Next time you see a lie being spread or a
jellinghaus-robert@CS.Yale.EDU |  bad decision being made out of sheer ignor-
ROBERTJ@{yalecs,yalevm}.BITNET |  ance, pause, and think of hypertext."
{everyone}!decvax!yale!robertj |     -- K. Eric Drexler, _Engines of Creation_