Subject: Deadly Donna
From: abbott@radar.ACA.MCC.COM (Jeff Abbott)
Date: 1990-09-18, 14:36
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

Just for fun. . .

Why hasn't anyone suspected Donna Hayward of offing her best friend?
I mean, Lynch painted Laura as a saint until the truth started coming
out about her - so why should we think Donna is any different. She
certainly gained a lot by Laura's death - namely, James. Look at their
early meetings - this girl was hot for him. And he was seeing her
evil best friend.

Twice, Donna has made statements that made me confused: first, she
convinced James that when they discovered the broken half of the 
heart necklace was gone, that they should NOT go to the police.

JAMES: We should go to the cops. . .
DONNA: No, james, we were the only ones who loved her. . .

Obviously, Donna doesn't want the authorities involved anymore than they
already are.

Secondly, when Audrey was trying to convince Donna to help her in her
own investigation, Donna demanded to know what Audrey  had already 
found out: "What do you know, Sherlock?" and made Audrey promise that
anything they found out would stay between the two of them. Could Donna
be concerned that Audrey might stumble onto something she'd rather not
have known?

We already know that Donna has the potential for evil: she lied to an
FBI agent, has hidden evidence in a murder case, broken into a doctor's
office, and in one shocking evening of depravity, snuck out of the house 
and almost forgot her sister's bike!!! :-)

"Hell hath no fury like a woman who's got the hots for her best
friend's biker-sensitive guy boyfriend."

(Someone reading this over my shoulder just said, "Jesus, Jeff,
you need to see the premiere BAD!")

Jeff Abbott
________________________________________________________________________
disclaimer: I didn't kill Laura Palmer. . .
abbott@mobius.aca.mcc.com
_________________________________________________________________________