Subject: Re: another Andy theory
From: fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu (Eric Olson)
Date: 1990-10-13, 09:43
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In article <Oct.13.02.10.51.1990.4471@romulus.rutgers.edu>, webster@romulus.rutgers.edu (John Clayton Webster) writes:
> > Eric Olson <fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu> writes:
> > 
>> >>Well, I'll believe it when we hear that the semen implanted in the girls (was
>> >>there any?) was sterile.
> > 
> > What are you talking about?  He said he was sterile.  Obviously, the
> > sperm bank didn't want any more donations.  I don't believe they
> > impregnate women with untested and steril (dead or low counts of)
> > sperm.

I didn't mean the semen the hospital/sperm bank implanted in them.  I meant the
old-fashioned way.

Sheesh, give people some technology, look what happens to old values...
-- Eric Olson <fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu> Gryphon Gang Fairbanks AK 99775