Subject: Re: Mr. Tojimura
From: timr@sco.COM (Bad Hurts Value)
Date: 1990-11-01, 23:27
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks
Reply-to: timr (Harold Allen Smithee)

In article <43570@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu writes:
> >In article <16844@shlump.nac.dec.com>, boyajian@ruby.dec.com (Cisco's Buddy) writes...
>> >><...> 
>> >>The burden of proof is on you to prove that Fumio Yamaguchi does *not*
>> >>exist.
> >
> >Agreed.  It seems we're getting a little carried away here(myself included) why
> >don't we proponents of the Fumio=Piper theory and the Fumio=Fumio theory wait
> >until this is conclusively resolved.

why discuss any theory before it's conclusively resolved?

> >I'm sure it will be.

i'm not.  i like the theory put forth by Douglas Van Wieren 
(douglasv@dip.eecs.umich.edu) that Piper, or whoever, is not
playing Catherine in disguise (it is clear to me that there's
a disguise--maybe even this Fumio, but it sure seems like a
woman).

> >When it is the people who were correct can all join in a collective:
> >"I told you so!"

-tim(what'swrongwithgettingalittlecarriedaway?)r
-- Of all the horrid, hideous notes of woe, Sadder than the owls songs or the midnight blast, Is that portentous phrase, "I told you so." --Byron, _Don Juan_ Usenet: !{uunet,ucbvax!ucscc,decvax!microsof}!sco!timr, ...!mcsun!ukc!scol!timr Internet: timr@sco.COM,timr%sco.COM@ucscc.UCSC.EDU,@ucscc.UCSC.EDU:timr@sco.COM