Subject: Re: Mr. Tojimura From: timr@sco.COM (Bad Hurts Value) Date: 1990-11-01, 23:27 Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks Reply-to: timr (Harold Allen Smithee) In article <43570@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> v101pyrw@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu writes: > >In article <16844@shlump.nac.dec.com>, boyajian@ruby.dec.com (Cisco's Buddy) writes... >> >><...> >> >>The burden of proof is on you to prove that Fumio Yamaguchi does *not* >> >>exist. > > > >Agreed. It seems we're getting a little carried away here(myself included) why > >don't we proponents of the Fumio=Piper theory and the Fumio=Fumio theory wait > >until this is conclusively resolved. why discuss any theory before it's conclusively resolved? > >I'm sure it will be. i'm not. i like the theory put forth by Douglas Van Wieren (douglasv@dip.eecs.umich.edu) that Piper, or whoever, is not playing Catherine in disguise (it is clear to me that there's a disguise--maybe even this Fumio, but it sure seems like a woman). > >When it is the people who were correct can all join in a collective: > >"I told you so!" -tim(what'swrongwithgettingalittlecarriedaway?)r -- Of all the horrid, hideous notes of woe, Sadder than the owls songs or the midnight blast, Is that portentous phrase, "I told you so." --Byron, _Don Juan_ Usenet: !{uunet,ucbvax!ucscc,decvax!microsof}!sco!timr, ...!mcsun!ukc!scol!timr Internet: timr@sco.COM,timr%sco.COM@ucscc.UCSC.EDU,@ucscc.UCSC.EDU:timr@sco.COM