Subject: Re: Lynch -- CRITICISM!!!
From: jespah@milton.u.washington.edu (Kathleen Hunt)
Date: 1990-12-04, 18:17
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

From: rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu (R o d Johnson)

*In article <MbKwlg600VpIR1RUwH@andrew.cmu.edu> rk3h+@andrew.cmu.edu (Robert J. Knapp) writes:
*>This is the first time I've ever responded to one of Mr. Newell's posts,
*>IMHO the best thing to do is not to flame him, but to sit back, think
*>about what he said, and just LAUGH!
*
*Well, this figures.  People have been bitching at Gary for weeks,
*telling him to quit yapping and say something constructive.  He
*finally does, an article with no sneering, no insults, and (to me at
*least) quite interesting. . . and gets *this* in reply.  If I were
*Gary, I'd just say "why bother?"  (I hope he won't, though.)

I have to agree, that was actually an interesting post.  I was glad to
see some discussion of the flaws & merits of Lynch's directorial style,
and that grand old Style Vs. Substance thing.  Gary, I disagree with
your conclusions, but it was a nice post. 

Jespah