Subject: Re: RS: Some guesses (including COOPER BOOK SPOILERS)
From: mpax@pbs.org (Cool Bean)
Date: 1991-05-02, 08:15
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In article <74230@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>, riacmt@ubvmsa.cc.buffalo.edu (Carol Miller-Tutzauer) writes:
> > In article <1991May1.184938.12596@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>, keb3@po.CWRU.Edu (Keith E. Bitely) writes...
>> >> 
>> >>In a previous article, alternat@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Ann Hodgins) says:
>>> >>>In article <12818@aggie.ucdavis.edu> ez002797@pollux.ucdavis.edu () writes:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>Just adds fuel to my growing conviction that Twin Peaks reality
>>> >>>must be either a dream or an alternative reality
>>> >>>of some other sort - that what is happening is not going to turn out to
>>> >>>be reality as we know it.
>> >> 
>> >>Awww...but, that would spoil all the fun.  My life has gotten pretty 
>> >>surrealistic lately, and I would hate to have it all be a dream.  
> > 
> > Actually....think about it.  This could be a GREAT ending.  The
> > whole thing hasn't been a DREAM but a VISION.  It's Cooper, 
> > back in Pittsburgh.  It's happening again...he's having one of
> > his visions.  Great setup for Twin Peaks -- The Movie.  It's
> > also a great pun on Dallas which also has ended for good this
> > season.
> > 
> > What do you peakers think?
> > 
> > Carol

Hate it.  To think we spent a year theorizing and analyzing nothing more
than a vision, would be a HUGE let down.  It would lose its mesmerizing
effect and that feeling of dread and evil we all love so much.

How could you then go see a movie, knowing the whole time its just another
vision?  It would take all of the fun out of it and the mystery, which I
find central to my addiction.

--Cool Bean
-- **This is not cultural.