Subject: Re: no answers From: bob@castle.ed.ac.uk (Bob Gray) Date: 1991-06-21, 08:31 Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks ABienek@acorn.co.uk (Alex Bienek) writes: > >some such. This way he could have moved toward a more consistant conclusion rather > >than having to constantly create new threads and hence dilute the initial idea. One of the major themes of the series was how things are composed of two parts, one of which is the opposite in some sense of the other. This theme was carried through the whole series. > >I was rather dissapointed. I expected much better things. The whole scene in the > >black/white lodge was a complete anti-climax I thought. After months of building I thought it was a brilliantly done tying together of all the different threads, hints and clues we have been presented with since the first episode. > >I maintain that had David Lynch had the complete story in mind when he started > >writing we would have been spared this damp squib ending ! He must have had a number of key points in mind leading up to the ending which he insisted on being included in the earlier stories. If he hadn't, everything wouldn't have fitted so neatly into place. Watch the last episode again and remember That everything contains its opposite. That BOB is fire. Hawk's description of the lodges. What the Major is most afraid of. The Log Lady's husband, and how he died. And of course, why the traffic lights are there, and why Dr. Jacoby wears those glasses. Bob.