Subject: Re: It's not backwards!!!
From: erics@sco.COM (eric smith)
Date: 1991-06-22, 13:09
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

01dbjohns@bsu-ucs.uucp writes:

> >Does anyone realize that they weren't really talking backwards in the
> >B/W lodges?  It was just altered.  If you listen, you can make out the
> >words plainly... sans sub-titles.

I thought it was fairly easy to understand what was being said, unlike
the original "dream" scene, where the subtitles were really necessary.

-----
Eric Smith         |  "If the automobile had followed the same development as
erics@sco.com      |   the computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get
erics@infoserv.com |   a million miles per gallon, and explode once a year
CI$: 70262,3610    |   killing everyone inside."  Robert Cringely/InforWorld