Subject: Re: It's glastonBURY, and other drivel
From: rhaller@phloem.uoregon.edu
Date: 1991-06-26, 12:06
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In article <1991Jun26.152750.21902@risky.ecs.umass.edu>
giovin@medr4.ecs.umass.edu (Rocky J Giovinazzo) writes:
> >In article <10340038@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM> brian@hplvec.LVLD.HP.COM (Brian Wood)
writes:
>> >>It's GLASTONBURY, not Glastonberry.  Let's fix this before it spreads!
>> >>Glastonberries don't make particularly good pie.
> >
> >The spelling of the King Arthur version may very well be 
> >Glastonbury.  However, since the "finale" doesn't ever show us this
> >spelling, the next best source is the access guide which spells it
> >Glastonberry.
> >
> >Rocky Giovinazzo
> >

Yup. Who says the people in the TP area who named the grove had to spell it the
same as the abbey. However, there are some interesting parallels between the
area shown on the Access map (and the pictograph) and features of the
Glastonbury site in England. I'll post them later.

-Rich Haller