Subject: Re: Handling of the END!
From: gal502@csc.anu.edu.au
Date: 1991-09-10, 01:55
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In article <1991Sep9.101856.1@wombat.newcastle.edu.au>, c9104666@wombat.newcastle.edu.au writes:
> > 
> > The final two hours was excellent! Many of you said that it was 
> > disappointing, that if left to many unanswered questions..!!!
                    (a few lines deleted)
> > David Lynch could have easily given us all want we wanted to see...
> > good triumph over evil (coop defeat WE) and tie up all the loose ends.But he 
> > didn't...... he thought of what we would most hate to see and took that option.
> > that's the man he is ...has he ever given people a nice easy to follow ending
> > to any of his work!!.
        Well, yes I think he has: the endings of "Wild at Heart", "Blue Velvet
and of the first series of TP all seemed a lot more positive than this one.
IMHO, David does not like to see evil triumphant, though it may not necessarily
be destroyed. I think what he had in mind was an interesting start to a third
series, without the problems that occured at the start of series 2, with Bob
dead and no reason for Cooper to remain.But no third series has eventuated as
yet.
        As for the rest of the final episode, I enjoyed it a lot, especially
with DL back in the directorial chair. I thought Kyle seemed to enjoy the role
of the evil Cooper, but I can't blame him, since Cooper has been such a zero
for so long! (This line is meant to provoke)
 
 I hope this posts OK. This is my first attempt at contributing to news.
     
     Graeme Lindsell.