Subject: Re: Who died and Donna's birth certificate
From: salmieri@whitebase.ukp.com (Gregory Salmieri)
Date: 1992-06-09, 12:44
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

joe@zitt (Joe Zitt) writes:

> > jblum@lucy.umd.edu (Jon Blum) writes:
> > 
>> > > I think it could be symbolic in a different way than you intend -- perhaps
>> > > that Ben too could be possessed.  Think about it.  Ben's a bad man who has
>> > > seen the light and changed.  Does the name "MIKE" ring a bell?
> > 
> > Not >that's< interesting! One possible bug: Were MIKE and Ben ever seen
> > together? It looks like one of the game rules (as it were) is that the
> > posessor and posessee can't be in different places...
> > --
> > "Go to an extreme and then retreat to a more useful position"  --  Brian Eno
> > Joe Zitt        ...cs.utexas.edu!kvue!zitt!joe         (512)450-1916

Yes, Ben was seen with MIKE, but Mike could have posessed him later on.
                                         -=*=- Gregory C. Salmieri -=*=-