Subject: Set/Location Consistency (was Re: Harold's Home in series, and FWWM) From: v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) Date: 1992-09-09, 12:17 Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks In article <18k3fjINNo46@agate.berkeley.edu>, sally@anableps.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson) writes... > > > > > >I also thought that the set up for Harold's place was compeletly > >different in the movie than it was in the series. For one thing > >wasn't his bookcase in a different place in the movie. And in > >the movie his place was much darker, and it seemed that walls > >were darker...though this might just be an effect, to set a > >darker movie befitting the dark mood of the film. But any > >of you lucky folks who were able to see the film more than > >once, can you confirm or deny this for me, that Harold's place > >was much different in the movie...just like the Palmers. > > > >Sally-- I saw FWWM for the second time last night, and after reading a couple of comments on here about the locations/sets and their soundstage counterparts, I paid close attention. Harold's room - or whatever that is; trailer? - is basically the same. The set from the second season was obviously BASED on the location they filmed his FWWM scenes in. There are bookcases on BOTH sides of his apartment - i.e., on both sides of the greenhouse (the door to which we are shown, but not the window). I thought it would have been a nice touch to show Harold actually HIDE the diary in his secret panel... As for the Palmer house -- this is the same house that was used in the pilot. This is the same house that the soundstage sets were based on. The thing that's throwing everybody (I think) is that it's no longer just a 2 dimensional, 9/10 human scale set: IT'S A REAL HOUSE NOW. And since FWWM is a movie, with more time and allowance for sophisticated shooting style, the look of the house through Lynch's camera can be more elaborate -- hence the confusion. The Hayward house - exterior and interior - is also the same from the pilot, just shot differently. Scott
Return