Subject: Re: What a Sequel Could Cover (was re Who's Judy, Garmonbozia = WM...) From: jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...) Date: 1992-09-16, 13:27 Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks In article v075q5fr@ubvmsb.cc.buffalo.edu (Scott J Gorcey) writes: > > I was thinking of something even more elaborate: the sequel would > > be divided into thirds, like FWWM was (pre-editing, anyway). > > I. Project Bluebook -- Gordon Cole, Major Briggs and Windom > > Earle make an odd, ominous, discovery investigating the > > bizarre murder of a woman in Bend, Oregon... as the > > Nixon Administration, which doesn't believe in Little > > Green Men From Mars, breaks the Project apart... > > II. Blue Rose (5 Years Later) -- Agent Phillip Jeffries investigates > > the disappearence in Missoula, Montana of an Agent named Judy, > > who, until now, had been Cole's top Blue Rose operative... > > Jeffries successfully (perhaps) infiltrates The Black Lodge > > and some of its secrets are laid before him... as he confronts > > the Evil Agent Cooper... minor point: Judy appears to actually be around at whatever time Jeffries came from. After all, she's "positive about this". > > III. Dweller at the Threshold -- Cooper is revealed, as Cole joins > > forces with Major Briggs (and Hawk) to attempt a rescue of > > "The Good Dale." The question of Annie Blackburn's health > > is answered satisfactorily... Briggs is killed heroically > > and afterwards, faces the biggest challenge of his "life..." > > Or something like that... How's that sound? Far too mainstream for Lynch. Explains too much. However... it would make a BRILLIANT piece of fan fiction. Or maybe even... dare we say?... an independent novel. My other worry is that, with a trilogy structure, once again all the segments would be too squeezed to be coherent. If it weren't for the two-hour time limit for a movie, I'd say go for it. However, I think that part III should probably be a film on its own in that case. >> >>Of course, Kyle wouldn't want to do another whole film just about him. >> >>Sigh. > > Probably not, but I'm sure he could be... er... "convinced." > > Yes, his life is his own, but he owes that life entirely to > > David Lynch and a little movie called "Blue Velvet." The only way I could think of that Kyle would be glad to come back is if he pulled a Blake (or a Spock) -- have it in his contract that he would be DEAD, as dead as humanly possible in Twin Peaks. Of course, when the focus of the show has been dead since before the first episode, and appeared in the next fifteen episodes, being dead doesn't really mean that much. > > Anyone ever make the connection between Kyle's reluctance to > > have anything more to do with Peaks and his lover Lara Flyn > > Boyle's flat out REFUSAL to have anything more to do with > > Peaks? Why, yes. I've just been too polite to say anything about it. :-)
Return