Subject: Re: Garmonbozia backwards From: rhaller@oregon.uoregon.edu (Rich Haller) Date: 1992-09-19, 12:49 Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks In article <2ABA9E53.23329@ics.uci.edu>, bvickers@net3.ics.uci.edu (Brett J. Vickers) wrote: > > > > Someone else echoed what I had been thinking about when they > > said they would be more convinced if "I is Windom Earle" had > > something to do with eyes rather than "I". Why not "Eye is > > Windom Earle"? Can anyone think of a significance for this? After experimenting with MacRecorder, I have come to the following conclusions. 1. Whatever the phrase is, it definitely starts with 'I' or 'eye' (or another word with that intial sound. 2. It definitely ends with 'Windom Earle'. 3. It is not clear what comes inbetween. Here are two phrases that to my ear (unfortunately I am hard of hearing and wear hearing aids) sound close to 'garmonbozia' when played backward. 1. "I saw Windom Earle". 2. "Eyes of Windom Earle". The original hypothesis, "I is Windom Earle", is also a candidate. When I try recording 'garmonbozia' using the same intonation, as the MFAP, the part that is in the middle and is in dispute, sounds like 'zaw' to me. I have found no way to get a 'b' sound, except by using 'b'. My current theory is that there is no b in the phrase. It was introduced by MFAP when he pronounces what he hears when the phrase is played backward to him. It could be the result, I suppose, of the sound equivalent of an 'optical illusion' produced by the actual sounds when played in reverse. However, it may also be the case that the 'b' is in there because visually we have creamed corn, and maybe there was a conscious or unconcious connection with garbanzo beans. This may be my last post until I find an nntp server that carries alt.tv.twin-peaks and will let me connect. If there is someone out there who will do me that favor, please contact me by e-mail. The powers that be here at the University of Oregon have decided that we must drop the alt groups. This has been a lot of fun. Hope to type at you again some time. -Rich Haller
Return