Subject: Re: TV Guide
From: sjohnson@faulen.asd.sgi.com (Scott Johnson)
Date: 1992-10-05, 09:51
Newsgroups: alt.tv.twin-peaks

In <15902@umd5.umd.edu> jblum@hamlet.umd.edu (Hi ho -- Kermit the Frog here...) writes:

> >Looking through some old "Cheers & Jeers"...

> >I'm surprised that TV Guide, the magazine that jeered the second-season
> >premiere for being so slow, jeered #2009 for not making sense, jeered the
> >finale for not wrapping the show up, and has generally boosted Northern
> >Exposure as being better than Peaks... actually cheered FWWM two or three
> >weeks ago.  They said that it was a great present for fans, not meant for
> >the critics who had been deriding it so mercilessly.

> >And they said that without a hint of irony.  :-)

someone in TVGuide likes them, someone hates them.  at some point in
C&J, right after Northern Exposure came out, they jeered the critics
for hailing it as a new and improved Twin Peaks, saying about TP,
"Hey, we like this show."  but i get the feeling that isn't true
about all the staff, and different people write C&J each time.

sj"Your prejudice won't keep you warm tonight" - m

</pre>
<hr><a target="right" href="/fwwm/index.txt">Return</a></body></html>