Season 2, Episode 02: Coma — October 06–12, 1990
Cooper learns his ex-partner, Windom Earle, has escaped from a mental asylum; Major Briggs gives Cooper a message; Donna meets an eerie old woman and her grandson; Ben orders Leland killed; Deputy Andy thinks he's sterile; Audrey learns more about Laura, but is uncovered by a vengeful Blackie.
Subject
From
Date
Redness brennan@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Joseph Brennan) 1990-10-08 11:12
Why isn't it all red this season? or,
Why was it all red last season?
[src]
What do we know? jp4t+@andrew.cmu.edu (Jean-Luc H. Park) 1990-10-08 11:31
Ok, so BOB is an owl. Messages from somewhere else are talking to Cooper, the log lady is becoming a character who has access to many facts, but not ability to retrieve them. The kid's magic trick was rather impressive, especially for the setting. So to anyone who thought that T.P. was going to get saner, it won't. Sit back, relax, watch, and enjoy, there ain't much you can do about it. J-l P[src]
Re: Ludicrous Owl Theory cluther@supernet.haus.com (Clay Luther) 1990-10-08 11:50
wherry@alazif.enet.dec.com (bradley g wherry) writes: > >I think its pretty safe to say that bob is bob, he's not an owl, and I doubt > >that he is human. Based on the episode 2.2, we can now conjecture that Bob just might be an owl. Also, I don't think the Leland killed Laura theory holds up after 2.2 either. > >brad wherry | Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam; -- Clay Luther, Postmaster cluther@supernet.haus.com postmaster@supernet.haus.com clay.luther@supernet.haus.com Harris Adacom Corporation MS 23, PO Box 809022, Dallas, Tx 75380-9022 214/386-2356 Your mileage may vary. Void where prohibited.[src]
Re: The Horne Brothers said it all (10/6) chem63@menudo.uh.edu (Chang) 1990-10-08 11:58
I hate it when the producers decided to make n years of episodes a long dream sequence. St. Elsewhere, Bob Newhart, Twin Peaks... Bernard Chang.[src]
Re: aDiane's degree, was n rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu (R o d Johnson) 1990-10-08 12:27
In article <8673@milton.u.washington.edu> twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) writes: > >In article <484@kaos.MATH.UCLA.EDU> sherman@math.ucla.edu (William Sherman) writes: //- No question about it. The character I'd like to see most brought to TP has //to be Diane Shapiro, Ph.d. Brandeis. >> >>I'm with you on this. She must be a cool character for Hawk to say that >> >>she's given him 'a singular joy'. And what's her Ph.D. in, anyway? > >Probably Sanscrit. Um. . . why? -- Rod Johnson * rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu * (313) 650 2315 "Dogs bark at strangers" -- Heraclitus[src]
Rethinking the Log Lady rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu (R o d Johnson) 1990-10-08 12:31
In article <2810@jaytee.East.Sun.COM> msmiller@Sun.COM (Mark Miller) writes: > >I agree that Leland is the obvious choice - he got Renault and Jacoby > >(so it seems) - and he's clearly the most unhinged person there, save > >for the Log Lady. You know, given the fact that Cooper is getting messages from every which way these days, and given that the Log Lady's last "transmission" was quite appropriate, I'd have to say that we really have no reason to think of her as unhinged AT ALL. Odd, yes, but pretty much on top of things as they are (as opposed to how they seem). No? -- Rod Johnson * rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu * (313) 650 2315 "Dogs bark at strangers" -- Heraclitus[src]
Re: The Kid Magician revisited calvert@convex.com (Arleigh Calvert) 1990-10-08 12:37
Although I had 4 years of French in Jr. High and High School, and there are many more fluent than I, I thought the KM said, "Et une ame solitaire" describing Harold Smith next door, whom Donna was going to visit.[src]
Re: The Horne Brothers said it all (10/6) fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu (Eric Olson) 1990-10-08 12:47
In article <15922@bfmny0.BFM.COM>, tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes: > > In article <1990Oct7.114315.1@acad3.fai.alaska.edu> fsejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu (Eric Olson) writes: >> >>And while I'm at it, let me add that I don't think I can handle the frustration >> >>of seeing whatsername's not to Special Agent under his bed anymore. > > > > Well, it sure doesn't say much for the maid service at the Great > > Northern, does it? (Knowing Lynch, he'd show us the maid carefully > > replacing the note under the bed each day after cleaning...) > > Are we, here, talking about the maid service which left a man who'd been shot on the floor? Ah. No, that was /room/ service. Sorry. My mistake. -- Eric Olson <fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu> Gryphon Gang Fairbanks AK 99775[src]
Cooper, madman fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu (Eric Olson) 1990-10-08 12:53
In article <1990Oct8.210108.8489@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) writes: > > > > Somebody posted Cooper-as-lunatic-pretending-to-be-FBI here well before > > it was used as ``TWIN PEAKS THEORY #42.'' Now that's a strange idea. Although he did (apparently) walk into One-Eyed Jack's with $10,000 of ``the Agency's money'' he did turn out to be a card- counter so that doesn't rule it out. (The point being that there aren't too many rich lunatics running around.) (Anyone know Lynch's salary?) > > Why is Ben's ownership of One-Eyed Jack's supposed to be such a big > > secret. Einar Thorson knows, and he doesn't seem the embodiment of discretion. But he's been taken in hand by the brothers weird, who're trying to sell him on the idea that Twin Peaks is a small community with big city entertainments available... -- Eric Olson <fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu> Gryphon Gang Fairbanks AK 99775[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu (Eric Olson) 1990-10-08 12:56
In article <8792@milton.u.washington.edu>, twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) writes: > > > > Well, Killer Bob may or may not be a killer or have killed Laura > > Palmer, but he's one spooky dude. I found that maniacal expression > > of eagerness as he scrambled spider-like over the sofa and coffee > > table toward Maddy very menacing and *really scary*. > > So did I, but this may just be Maddie's /impression/ of big bob, since she didn't exactly meet him under the best of circumstances. Ahem. -- Eric Olson <fxejo@acad3.fai.alaska.edu> Gryphon Gang Fairbanks AK 99775[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) 1990-10-08 13:01
In article <1158600093@cdp> forestwatch@cdp.UUCP writes: > >The owls are not what they seem. Killer Bob is an owl. > >Killer Bob is not what he seems (i.e., a killer). Ergo: Killer > >Bob did not kill Laura Palmer. Agreed! Well thought through. As to who DID kill her, I don't think we can judge anything based on "attitudes" displayed so far, because the authors are playing those close to the vest, changing them at will to explain plot points. James could turn vicious next episode and get pinned with the killing and that'd be it. Or it could still be Leo, heck why not. But I do like Donna for it, finally. She has the jealousy motive. -- Anthrax Rampant in Kirghizia: Oo*oO Tom Neff Izvestia Comment -- TASS * *O* * tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM[src]
Re: ENDANGERED TIBET - ECOLOGY CONFERENCE starpath@athena.mit.edu (David E Hollingsworth) 1990-10-08 13:09
I don't think this made it the first time, so I'm trying it again.
Enjoy...
In article <899@gnosys.svle.ma.us>, gst@gnosys.svle.ma.us (Gary S. Trujillo) writes:
|>
|> E N D A N G E R E D T I B E T
|> An Ecology Conference
|> Featuring
|> GALEN ROWELL
|>
|> Saturday, October 27, 1990
|> 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM
|> Cowell Theater
|> Fort Mason Center
|> San Francisco, CA
|>
|> " If I had to do it all over again there's only one
|> thing I would have done differently. I wouldn't have
|> compromised the story of Tibet's environmental de-
|> struction as much as I did. Then, I was worried about
|> going back. Now I simply want to tell the story."
|> -- Galen Rowell
|>
|>
|> 8:30 - 9:00 am Registration
|> 9:00-9:15 am Introduction
|> 9:15-10:30 am Galen Rowell
|> The Agony of Tibet : The story of
|> the environmental destruction of Tibet.
|> With slides
|> 10:30-11:15am Orville Schell
|> Chinese attitudes to conservation
|> & to Tibet
|>
|> 11:15-12:00 Tibetan Witnesses Panel
|> 12:00 - 1:00 pm Lunch
|> 1:00 - 1:15pm Comments by David Brower
|> 1:15-2:25pm Nancy Nash & Tenzin Atisha
|> Tibetan/Buddhist perceptions of nature &
|> conservation; Tibetan ecology proposals
|> 2:25-3:35 pm Elmar Reiter
|> Central Asian deforestation & its
|> environmental effects
|> 3:35-3:45pm Break
|> 3:45-4:45pm Panel: What We Can Do!
|> Moderator: Michael van Walt
|> 4:45-5:00pm Concluding remarks
|>
|> The highly developed Tibetan culture retains as a core value
|> compassion for all living beings and the protection of habitat.
|> Exploitation of the earth's resources is perceived as resulting
|> in disharmony. Since the 1949 invasion of Tibet and subsequent
|> occupation by China, Tibet has witnessed ecology devastation
|> of appalling proportions. Indiscriminate shooting has greatly reduced
|> Tibetan wildlife and endangered many species inluding the
|> snow leopard, wild yak, argali sheep and black-neck crane.
|> Severe deforestation and over-grazing has led to erosion and
|> flooding. The Dalai Lama, in his Five Point Peace Plan for
|> Tibet, has called for "restoration and protextion of Tibet's
|> natural environment." This conference seeks to spotlight and
|> help address the issue of the threat to the Tibetan people and
|> environment.
|>
|> Registration
|> __ $35 conference fee
|> __ 20 conference fee (students)
|> __ 6 bag lunch (optional)
|> __ 60 conference fee + signed copy of My Tibet
|>
|> Please make checks payable to Bay Area Friends of Tibet &
|> note on the check "for ecology conference."
|> Mail registration forms & checks to:
|>
|> Humanitas,
|> Post Office Box 818
|> Menlo Park, CA 94026
|>
|> Any $$ remaining after meeting conference expenses
|> will be used for ecology projects of the Bay Area Friends
|> of Tibet, the International Campaign for Tibet, & ECO_Tibet USA.
|>
|> For further information, please contact Ed Lazar,
|> conference coordinator, at Humanitas.
|> TEL: 415/324-9077
|> FAX: 415/328-0845
|>
|> --
|> Gary S. Trujillo gst@gnosys.svle.ma.us
|> Somerville, Massachusetts {wjh12,bu.edu,spdcc,ima,cdp}!gnosys!gst
David Hollingsworth
[src]
Does Lynch read this newsgroup? raoul@milton.u.washington.edu (Robert #6) 1990-10-08 13:14
I s
I sometimes wonder what would happen to the show if Lynch or Frost
started reading this newsgroup. I'm sure they'd find it quite entertaining,
but they might also get some great ideas to incorporate into the plot.
"Hmmmm, space aliens. It could work."
^Twin Peaks^
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
[src]
Re: Redness twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) 1990-10-08 13:17
In article <1990Oct8.181208.19195@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> brennan@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu (Joseph Brennan) writes: > > > > Why isn't it all red this season? or, > > > > Why was it all red last season? It was all red last season because they had you in the Red Room. It's *not* all red this season because you've been given visiting privileges and get to socialize with others during Happy Hour. --Barbara -- Barbara HlavinMoab is my wash-pot; over Edom twain@blake.acs.washington.eduwill I cast out my shoe; Philistia, U Washington JC-21/Seattle 98105be thou glad of me.[src]
Re: aDiane's degree, was n twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) 1990-10-08 13:34
> >//- No question about it. The character I'd like to see most brought to TP has > >//to be Diane Shapiro, Ph.d. Brandeis. > > >>> >>>I'm with you on this. She must be a cool character for Hawk to say that >>> >>>she's given him 'a singular joy'. And what's her Ph.D. in, anyway? > > >> >>Probably Sanscrit. > > > > > >Um. . . why? > > > > > >- Rod Johnson- Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. I meant it as a joke. However, let me put my Agent Cooper hair on: Sanscrit because it is an ancient language of India, where the Buddha was born. The study of it is very esoteric; for instance, Jeffrey Masson, he of the expose _In the Freud Archives_, has a Ph.D. in Sanscrit. --Barbara -- Barbara HlavinMoab is my wash-pot; over Edom twain@blake.acs.washington.eduwill I cast out my shoe; Philistia, U Washington JC-21/Seattle 98105be thou glad of me.[src]
Re: Did Bobby kill someone in the past? larry%csccat.cs.com@AWIWUW11.WU-Wien.AC.AT (Larry Spence) 1990-10-08 13:40
In article <30691@netnews.upenn.edu> hafken@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (David Hafken) writes:
> >Just a quick question for those of you with good memories: was it mentioned
> >last season that Bobby had killed someone in the past? Or was it Leo they
> >were talking about? Does anyone know which episode # this was mentioned.
In the diary, Laura writes about a drug deal gone bad where, as they (Laura,
Leo, Bobby) zoomed away in a pickup, Bobby shot and killed a man who was
hiding in the bed of the pickup. Neither of them lets it "sink in" until
much later when Laura brings it up -- then Bobby breaks down crying.
--
Larry Spence
larry@csccat.cs.com
...{uunet,texsun,cs.utexas.edu,decwrl}!csccat!larry
[src]
Re: comments on 9/30 premiere sherman@oak.math.ucla.edu (William Sherman) 1990-10-08 13:44
In article <1990Oct7.034415.11451@zip.eecs.umich.edu> chrisl@dip.eecs.umich.edu (Chris Lang) writes: > >Finally, what happened to Hank that turned him from "one of the best of us" > >into a drug-dealer and a murderer? He was seduced by the dark side of the force. His name used to be "Anakin Skywalker". Furthermore, he's Cooper's father. Bill Sherman sherman@math.ucla.edu Just on the border of your waking mind, there lies another time where darkness and light are one; and as you tread the halls of sanity, you feel so glad to be unable to go beyond. I have a message from another time. -ELO[src]
Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) 1990-10-08 14:01
Somebody posted Cooper-as-lunatic-pretending-to-be-FBI here well before it was used as ``TWIN PEAKS THEORY #42.'' Why is Ben's ownership of One-Eyed Jack's supposed to be such a big secret. Einar Thorson knows, and he doesn't seem the embodiment of discretion. Charles Blair[src]
Enterprise to Star Fleet Command patl@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti) 1990-10-08 14:32
In article <12627789439009@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU> PUTNAM-L@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU (Lee Putnam) writes: > > > > -Lynch has entered the realm of sci-fi and that is great. I now intend to sit > > back and watch many of you bicker about the "absurdity" of TP. Entering the realm of sci-fi is fine, as long as it's GOOD sci-fi. The "message from outer space" scene, with Cooper's awe-struck "Oh, my God" could have come from any bad B movie. IM(not so)HO, Lynch has gravely misjudged his audience in throwing this trash at us. No longer just adding spice, the supernatural has taken over the show. Aside from one-liners, Twin Peaks just isn't that good this season. -Pat "Has anyone seen Bob on earth in the last few weeks?"[src]
Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) 1990-10-08 15:06
In article <1990Oct8.210108.8489@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>, ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) writes: > > Why is Ben's ownership of One-Eyed Jack's supposed to be such a big > >secret. Einar Thorson knows, and he doesn't seem the embodiment of discretion. Also, why would they fire Laura from OEJ's for drug use???!!!?? The whole place is full of druggies and is managed by a junkie? gln[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) 1990-10-08 15:11
In article <1158600093@cdp> forestwatch@cdp.UUCP writes: > > > >The owls are not what they seem. Killer Bob is an owl. *>Killer Bob is not what he seems (i.e., a killer).* Ergo: Killer > >Bob did not kill Laura Palmer. > > > >Jeffrey St. Clair Well, Killer Bob may or may not be a killer or have killed Laura Palmer, but he's one spooky dude. I found that maniacal expression of eagerness as he scrambled spider-like over the sofa and coffee table toward Maddy very menacing and *really scary*. Twin Peaks has started giving me nightmares. I dreamed Saturday night that Blackie and Jerry Horne welded a thin metal plate to Shelley Johnson's face. (No analysis, please!) --Barbara -- Barbara HlavinMoab is my wash-pot; over Edom twain@blake.acs.washington.eduwill I cast out my shoe; Philistia, U Washington JC-21/Seattle 98105be thou glad of me.[src]
How Did you Know A.J. Lynch is named P.T.? clc5_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (BOB) 1990-10-08 15:15
I posted once before about all the presidential references in
an episode last season (The one where the Log Lady slaps Coops hand) and
I was wondering if you would all pardon my ignorance and tell me how you
know or found out that Austin Jack (after Nance?) Lynch's character's
name is Pierre Tremond. Was it in the diary, I can't remember. Or was it
in the credits (I remember it saying something like little boy or
something). Anyway Just wondering where you got it and thanks 4 the hours
of additional entertainment and theory as well as the reminders not to
take this to seriously.
Yummy Fir,
Chris Coleman
[src]
Re: TP Anagrams and fish sherman@oak.math.ucla.edu (William Sherman) 1990-10-08 15:21
In article <27810002@hprpcd.HP.COM> jimh@hprpcd.HP.COM (Jim Hickey) writes: > >Maddy's full name anagrams to: FIRE SONG MEAN DUEL (with no leftover letters) Sorry, but "Madeleine Ferguson" has 17 letters. Your anagram has 16. > >Is it too obvious or do the two letters found under the girls > >fingernails (T and R) remind you of harry s. TRuman? There was some discussion of this a few days ago. Or was it weeks? There was some other evidence re: Harry discussed, if you want to go back and look for it (a frightening prospect). Bill Sherman sherman@math.ucla.edu Just on the border of your waking mind, there lies another time where darkness and light are one; and as you tread the halls of sanity, you feel so glad to be unable to go beyond. I have a message from another time. -ELO[src]
Laura's Mom luksa@ils.nwu.edu (Frank Luksa) 1990-10-08 15:38
Why is the vision of Laura's mother running down the stairs important. I believe Cooper saw this in his first dream as well. Any ideas about its significance? Sorry if this has already been covered but I don't remember reading about it. frank.[src]
Re: Maddy/Laura . . . dougm@zip.Convergent.COM (Doug Moran) 1990-10-08 15:41
c2h5oh@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Idealistic Bibliomystic) writes: > >In article <Ub3vPWu00WB5A9vIdw@andrew.cmu.edu> sb2t+@andrew.cmu.edu (Susan Lynn Bowser) writes: >> >>Now I don't exactly support the "Maddy is really Laura" theory, >> >>but I know everyone (including Donna) noticed the way that >> >>James and Maddy looked at each other when they were all singing. A friend of mine has this theory: Maddy is Laura, and BOB is Laura. Laura, not Leland or Ben, is the one with MPD. Laura, in her BOB persona, killed herself. The man we have been calling BOB tried to revive her, unsuccessfully. Who wrapped her in plastic and dumped her in the river, I'm sure I don't know. Laura in her Diary speaks of having visions of BOB. Maddy has visions of BOB. Of course, Cooper and Sarah are also having visions of BOB, so who knows. I wonder how much of The Book of the Subgenius (written by the followers of J.R. "BOB" Dobbs) David Lynch has read. [speaking of James' singing] > >during the singing. (and Lord, what singing! How'd he DO that voice?) I don't know about anyone else, but it sounded a lot like Richard O'Brian, of Rocky Horror fame, to me. -- Doug Moran | He played the `Anvil Chorus' by blowing on pyramid!ctnews!sparky!dougm | knives and forks, and for a finish he blew up dougm@sparky.Convergent.com | a turkey until music came out of its ass.[src]
Names of Characters dougm%zip.Convergent.COM@AWIWUW11.WU-Wien.AC.AT (Doug Moran) 1990-10-08 15:58
Just some grist for the mill:
Palmer: A medieval European pilgrim who carried a palm branch as a token
of having visited the Holy Land.
Cooper: One who makes or repairs wooden tubs and casks.
And I refuse to comment on Lucy's last name.
--
Doug Moran | He played the `Anvil Chorus' by blowing on
pyramid!ctnews!sparky!dougm | knives and forks, and for a finish he blew up
dougm@sparky.Convergent.com | a turkey until music came out of its ass.
[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems cioffi@menudo.uh.edu (Delia Cioffi) 1990-10-08 15:59
In article <8792@milton.u.washington.edu> twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) writes: > >Twin Peaks has started giving me nightmares...... I know what you mean about TP sensibilities invading one's life. Since May, everytime I approach the denouement of whatever mystery novel I'm reading, I can't *believe* they're just going to *tell* me who the killer is! Or that the story is actually going to resolve itself...and *end*! It seems my default clock has been reset to Twin Peaks Time. -- ================================================================= Delia Cioffi: -- University of Houston: cioffi@menudo.uh.edu -- Stanford University: cioffi@psych.stanford.edu[src]
Lucy/Andy/FleshWorld jguy@lilith.EBay.Sun.COM (Jeff Bone) 1990-10-08 16:28
(Apologies if this is a repost)
In light of this past episode's Lucy/Andy exchange and the fact that
they (L & A) appeared to be engaged in other activities, are we to
assume that the search of FleshWorld back issues for a TB connection
proved unsuccessful?
Surely The Creators didn't forget that they had L & A doing this...
Thoughts?
--
---- jbone@Sun.COM --------------------------------------------------
"...it's a game with added reality..." - Master & Servant, D. Mode
------------------------------------------------------ Jeff Bone ----
--
[src]
Messages, French and more exotic spok@MATHOM.GANDALF.CS.CMU.EDU (John Ockerbloom) 1990-10-08 17:04
The French sentence that the young Lynch spoke while holding
the cream corn sounded to me like
^
J'ai une ame solitaire
(translation: I have a solitary soul.)
The "alien" message bugs me. I haven't gone back to look at the
printout, but it looked like the printout data was supposed to be
radio signal samples, encoded into a four-character format (usually
a letter and some digits.) So how could *any* external signal, whether
from aliens or not, yield strings like COOPER/COOPER/COOPER?
Unless you were intervening at some point *after* the signals were
supposedly received and encoded, I don't see how you'd do it.
(Of course, I'd imagine that whoever inserted the message would have
to know the implementation of the signal-coder very well, since there is as
yet no universal standard for transmitting text via radio.)
In any case, there still exist numerous possible meanings
and sources for Major Briggs' message. Some of them could
be quite intriguing. (I leave the possibilities as an exercise
for the reader.) But I'll be disappointed if Lynch develops
the story to be dependent on the message taken at face value.
John Ockerbloom
-- ========================================================================== ockerbloom@cs.cmu.edu ...!uunet!cs.cmu.edu!ockerbloom ocker@yalecs.bitnet (forwarded) 4209 Murray Ave., Pittsburgh PA 15217
[src]
Re: Enterprise to Star Fleet Command tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) 1990-10-08 17:15
In article <1990Oct8.213209.16790@athena.mit.edu> patl@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti) writes: > >In article <12627789439009@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU> > >PUTNAM-L@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU (Lee Putnam) writes: >> >> -Lynch has entered the realm of sci-fi and that is great. I now intend to sit >> >> back and watch many of you bicker about the "absurdity" of TP. > > > >Entering the realm of sci-fi is fine, as long as it's GOOD sci-fi. The > >"message from outer space" scene, with Cooper's awe-struck "Oh, my God" > >could have come from any bad B movie. With all due respect -- bullshit! If the exact same premise were presented in ASIMOV'S or F&SF in a story by some respectable author, we'd accept it without blinking an eye. This is the SF community's double standard working on overdrive. When we encounter palpable nonsense in a LeGuin or Lafferty story, we withhold scorn because we know the creative content of the whole will justify the excursion. Why deny Lynch and Frost the same breathing room? Who's more brilliant: David Lynch or Joe Schmoe landing his first ANALOG sale? > >IM(not so)HO, Lynch has gravely misjudged his audience in throwing this > >trash at us. No longer just adding spice, the supernatural has taken > >over the show. I have agreed with this sentiment in an earlier posting, but my point was that the lay audience is not going to tolerate mystical mumbo jumbo when they expect a taut thriller. I suspect that SF aficionados are largely a captive audience and neither ABC not Lynch/Frost need be particularly afraid of losing them. -- Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, || Tom Neff lying in hospitals dying of nothing. -- Redd Foxx || tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM[src]
Re: The Kid Magician jsd@GAFFA.MIT.EDU (blood was flowing like water...) 1990-10-08 17:19
In article <1990Oct7.103708.14205@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> elf@dgp.toronto.edu (Eugene Fiume) writes: > >So, why does that kid magician look like a scale model of David Lynch, and Because he's David Lynch's son is the simple answer. It also happens to be the right one. The actor's name is Austin Jack Lynch. +---------------------- Is there any ESCAPE from NOISE? ---------------------+ | | |\ | jsd@gaffa.mit.edu | ZIK ZAK - We make everything you need, | | \|on |/rukman | -Fight The Power- | and you need everything we make. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+[src]
TP: Confusion about Mill ledgers bobg+@andrew.cmu.edu (Robert Steven Glickstein) 1990-10-08 17:20
Could someone explain to me what's going on with the Mill ledgers? Ben says that the real one "masterminded by Catherine" shows the Mill sliding into bankruptcy. The fake one, according to Ben, shows the Mill turning a healthy profit. I thought Catherine was cooking a fake ledger which showed the Mill sliding into bankruptcy. I thought that she believed she was doing it so that the Mill fire would look like Josie torched a losing business to collect the insurance money. In other words, I believed that the Mill was doing fine, and Catherine wanted the Mill to look like it was losing money. The ledger that "spells bankruptcy" is the one that was hidden, remember. By the way, this is by far *not* the most confusing thing to me about Twin Peaks, these days. ______________ _____________________________ Bob Glickstein | Internet: bobg@andrew.cmu.edu Information Technology Center | Bitnet: bobg%andrew@cmuccvma.bitnet Carnegie Mellon University | UUCP: ...!harvard!andrew.cmu.edu!bobg Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 | (412) 268-6743 | Sinners can repent, but stupid is forever[src]
Continuity Error? I Don't Think So. George.Harris@samba.acs.unc.edu (BBS Account) 1990-10-08 17:35
Someone mentioned that the absence of the VCR atop the Johnsons' TV (seen when Hank shots Leo as Leo tries to kill Bobby, missing when Cooper, Truman et al. are searching chez Johnson) is a continuity error. I don't think so. Remember that they had acquired a search warrant & that usually includes a proviso re: removal of possibly relevant items, & a video tape has played a pivotal role in resolving a mystery earlier. I main- tain that the VCR was removed by those law enforcement types. However, I think the AB- goof & the heart on a thong/chain/thong are *definite* mistakes. "I'm not an actor, but I play one on TV"Ge|ge --[src]
Without Chemicals sally@eris.berkeley.edu (S. A. Wilson) 1990-10-08 17:58
I still say that that "without chemicals" thingy refers to Jacoby. He was acting even stranger than normal while in the hospital, even Dr. Hayward commented on it, asking the nurse what he was on. The nurse said only what you prescibed, & something about eatting some of his food. Then in walks Coop & he interrogates Jacoby. Jacoby in turn tells him about Laura, & that it appeared to him that she was about to confront something/one. He hints at suicide to which Coop refutes, but he says that although she did not physically kill her ownself, she brought it about. I think this is pointing the way to something, and thus the 3rd clue. For prior to this we & Coop sees the Smiling Bag, ie Jacques in the bodybag being carted off, then he interrogates Jacoby, then this week the Owl message. 1-2-3, in that order. Considerate la vostra semenza: || sally a. wilson fatti non foste a viver come bruti, || sally@mica.berkeley.edu ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza. || "il inferno": _Inferno_ Canto XXVI vv.118-120. || damn good poem, & hot too![src]
Re: "One chants out between two worlds..." (was Re: Save the owls?) dupree@hpclpa.HP.COM (Chuck Dupree) 1990-10-08 18:00
My impression of the poem Mike relates is: In the darkness of future past the magician longs to see one chance out between two worlds fire walk with me. I reran the tape four or five times to get this impression. That doesn't make it a certainty, though. - ced[src]
Re: How Did you Know A.J. Lynch is named P.T.? horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) 1990-10-08 18:45
In article <9777@ur-cc.UUCP> clc5_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (BOB) writes: > >I was wondering if you would all pardon my ignorance and tell me how you > >know or found out that Austin Jack (after Nance?) Lynch's character's > >name is Pierre Tremond. Was it in the diary, I can't remember. > > Yummy Fir, > > Chris Coleman Yeah it's somewhere very near the end of the diary, Laura gives the kid a little speech after he pulls a gold coin out of her ear. Michael Kaye horny@ucscb.ucsc.edu[src]
Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) 1990-10-08 19:01
In article <26165@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) writes: > >Also, why would they fire Laura from OEJ's for drug use???!!!?? The whole place > >is full of druggies and is managed by a junkie? > > > >gln info from the diary, but it's no biggie if you read it anyway. You don't understand, Laura didn't have a drug problem, she had a >>> >>>DRUG PROBLEM<<<. heh. According to Blackie, the customers were complaining about the shoddy service they had been getting lately with Laura's increased drug use. I don't think this is why she was fired or left. I think Blackie just freaked out after Laura's lesbian tryst with Blackie in which Laura totally dominated and overpowered her. Laura says she knew she'd never work at OEJ after this happened. So I think that's the reason. :) Laura says she has to tell the world about Benjamin after leaving OEJ, this could well have something to do with her death. Benjamin kills in TP to keep people quiet. Michael Kaye horny@ucscb.ucsc.edu "Say it isn't so Krusty!"[src]
Okay...my turn gail@wet.UUCP (Gail Gurman) 1990-10-08 19:02
Well, I don't remember Leland saying that he knew Bob as a real person.
I could be wrong, I haven't reviewed the tape yet, but my theory (which
is mine) is this (ahem):
Bob is the evil in the woods. He's been there a long time--a very long
time. He has been haunting people in the area for ages. He especially
preys on very young girls (typical of ghosts) but occasionally haunts
boys, too. Back when Leland was a kid, his family used to summer (?) at
Pearl Lakes (not very far, I think, from Twin Peaks). While there,
Bob haunted him. However, he was very young at the time, the haunting
was probably short-lived, and the experience horrifying enough for
him to suppress it.
Now, many years later, he's acting crazy. There are two related
possibilities for this. One is that the suppressed experiences with
Bob came out as sexual abuse of Laura and now he is feeling guilty
(I believe this most) or he somehow recognized or sensed Laura's
experiences and they brought out weird reactions in him (I'm kind
of unclear about this idea).
Anyway, now he sees the picture of Bob and he recognizes him from
his boyhood haunting. What do you think?
Gail
PS. Jerry said something to Ben that seemed to basically sum up
the whole atmosphere of the show. I believe it was: "Is this
real or just some twisted dream?
-- Respond to claris!wet!gail@ames.arc.nasa.gov or gail@wet.UUCP
[src]
Re: How Did you Know A.J. Lynch is named P.T.? jake@pangea.Stanford.EDU (Jake Lowenstern) 1990-10-08 19:16
In article <7629@darkstar.ucsc.edu> horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) writes: > > > >Yeah it's somewhere very near the end of the diary, Laura gives > >the kid a little speech after he pulls a gold coin out of her ear. > > > >Michael Kaye horny@ucscb.ucsc.edu Minor point here, but several people have mentioned it. In the diary (page 180-181) Laura is talking about her conversation with Jacoby. "I told Dr. Jacoby...." "I told him...." "I told Dr. Jacoby..." "On the way...Pierre...picked a gold coin out of my ear and walked away." "I told him...." The 'him' at the start of the last paragraph is still referring to Jacoby, not Pierre. Pierre walked away, and can think of no reason Laura would tell the boy about BOB. Whatever..... ********************************* Not Jake, but Jon kull@msg.ucsf.edu *********************************[src]
The Hidden Truth SML108@psuvm.psu.edu (Scott the Great) 1990-10-08 19:39
If you ask me, all the events in Twin Peaks happened several months before the events in _The Hidden_, and therefore Special Agent Cooper will soon be killed in a forest fire and his body will be taken over by the giant. Meanwhile, Bob, who is in reality the villain alien from _The Hidden_ will go on a murder, robbery, and brouhaha spree throughout the west coast until finally being killed by The Giant's Bug-like Alien Zapper(tm). Finally, Harry Truman, who looks suspiciously like Michael Nouri, also of _The Hidden_ will be fatally wounded, only to be taken over by the Giant who lets go of Late Special Agent Cooper's body and runs off with Joan Chen. Happy ending... Or is the extraterrestrial sub-plot just another homage to a movie that's a rip-off of Hal Clement? "My Bowels are not what they seem" Scott Le Grand aka sml108@psuvm.psu.edu[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) 1990-10-08 19:39
In article <15924@bfmny0.BFM.COM> tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes: > >In article <1158600093@cdp> forestwatch@cdp.UUCP writes: >> >>The owls are not what they seem. Killer Bob is an owl. >> >>Killer Bob is not what he seems (i.e., a killer). Ergo: Killer >> >>Bob did not kill Laura Palmer. > > > >Agreed! Well thought through. > >Anthrax Rampant in Kirghizia: Oo*oO Tom Neff What?? No way! There are all kinds of things about the owls that aren't what they seem! This is an absurd jump of logic! If you believe that L.A. times article, than say so. Don't reinterpret every new piece of evidence to insist that it proves this conclusion, when it does not. This is not well thought out. There are many things about the owls that aren't what they seem. To me we already have our answer what the giant is reffering to, and that is that the owls are associated with BOB somehow. period! Ta da! No theories are demonstrated with it! (though they might turn out to be true.) Other things about owls and BOB that aren't what they seem include that BOB appears as simply human in coops vision, but he is not. There's more to him, perhaps he's a demon, vampire, spirit, whatever. His powers *might* include invisibility, mind control, mind reading, jumping through portals that take him to and from strange places. He able to conceal his true identity to Laura for 6+ years, and TP viewers forever. :) There is so much about BOB that isn't what it seems, that it is ridiculous to think "the owls are not what they seem" means that BOB isn't Laura's killer. I don't pretend to understand what really happened in that train car, you shouldn't either. :) I am on a nightmare of a terminal, apologies to all. Michael Kaye horny@ucscb.ucsc.edu "look it's trying to think"[src]
Re: Was It Me? broehl@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Bernie Roehl) 1990-10-08 20:01
In article <ob2soz_00Vo9IXyrsG@andrew.cmu.edu> es2j+@andrew.cmu.edu (Edward John Sabol) writes:
> >But for a brief second I think it showed Laura's face, and I've never
> >seen anything so evil or scary or disturbing. Killer Bob looked like a pussy-
> >cat in comparison.
I'm not convinced he's what we think he is.
-- Bernie Roehl, University of Waterloo Electrical Engineering Dept Mail: broehl@watserv1.waterloo.edu OR broehl@watserv1.UWaterloo.ca BangPath: {allegra,decvax,utzoo,clyde}!watmath!watserv1!broehl Voice: (519) 885-1211 x 2607 [work]
[src]
Re: aDiane's degree, was n rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu (R o d Johnson) 1990-10-08 20:04
In article <8789@milton.u.washington.edu> twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) writes: [On how Hawk's girlfriend Diane's Ph.D. is:] >>> >>>Probably Sanscrit. So I sez: >> >>Um. . . why? > >Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. I meant it as a joke. Well, geez, I knew *that*. I just didn't *get* the joke. > >However, let me put my Agent Cooper hair on: Sanscrit because it is > >an ancient language of India, where the Buddha was born. Uh huh. . . > >The study of it is very esoteric; for instance, Jeffrey Masson, he of > >the expose _In the Freud Archives_, has a Ph.D. in Sanscrit. Not *that* esoteric--we taught Sanskrit to undergrads in my old department at Michigan. I've even been known to utter a few words of it myself now and then. I just didn't see what the connection was to Hawk's girlfriend. But never mind, I spose. -- Rod Johnson * rjohnson@vela.acs.oakland.edu * (313) 650 2315 "Dogs bark at strangers" -- Heraclitus[src]
Various odd thoughts... katefans@world.std.com (Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago) 1990-10-08 20:17
1) Space Aliens? Supernatural Beings? Killer Bobs From Another Dimension?
Talking Logs? Whatever happens, I can handle it because NOTHING Lynch
could possibly come up with is as highly improbable as the fact
that he has a Soap Opera airing on Prime Time Network TV!
2) Here in Chicago the opening credits were different than usual. The
shot of the bird and the sawblades were cut out. Was it that way
everywhere? If so, could it have been a reference to the mill
burning down? No mill-no sawblades.
3) Ok, so who's Lucy been sleeping with?
a) Cooper-No way, he wasn't in town.
b) Harry-possible, if he's been seeing Josie for only six weeks
maybe he & Lucy were having an affair before. The timing is
good. I don't think so though. They are too natural together.
There's no sense of tension between them at all.
c) Hawk-no, he seems to go for well-educated classy women. Lucy
is smarter than she sometimes appears, but just doesn't seem
his type.
d) There are other deputies around that we haven't really met,
but I tend to think that it's going to be someone we all know.
e) For some silly and illogical reason, I keep seeing Lucy and
Jerry Horne together. I'm not seriously suggesting he's the
one, but if he wern't such a sleezy scumbag, they'd make a cute
couple.
f) Until Lynch tells us who it is, the only way to get clues is
to re-watch the earlier episodes and look for a place where
Lucy seems uncomfortable with someone. Can anyone think of an
instance?
g) Possibly she was raped, but that's not very likely. She doesn't
act like such a traumatic experience has happened to her recently.
h) As long as we're talking about Lucy, Kimmy Robertson is making
a guest appearance (she'll be singing!) on Roger McGuinn's
comeback album. It's due for release in February.
4) A small city the size of Twin Peaks would have a local police
department, besides a Sheriffs Office. Why haven't we seen any
local cops? I grew up in a city of 35,000 and we had both.
5) Re: Cooper meeting Maddy. I just can't let this go.
I think it's an insult to Cooper's intelligence and observational
powers to say that he didn't notice Maddy at Laura's funeral.
My God SHE WAS RIGHT THERE! Sunglasses or no, that mouth is pretty
unique. Cooper had not only seen Laura up close and dead, he's seen
the photos in her house and the videotape she, Donna and James made.
The main reason he was at the funeral was to check out people to see
who came and who didn't (he sure noticed that Jacoby wasn't there)
and watch how the people there acted. He would have seen when Leland
and Sarah arrived. He would have seen that there was someone with
them. He would have seen that that woman bore some resemblance to
Laura. Family resemblance.
We don't always have to assume that, if we haven't seen it happen
onscreen then it didn't happen. My theory is that Cooper was
introduced to Maddy before the service began. He probably filed her
under "possible link/cousin/lived in another state at time of
Laura's death/not high priority to interview at this time/Amazing
Resemblence!"
One thing about TP--it's making time slow down. BTP (Before Twin Peaks)
weeks & months used to zip by. DTP (During Twin Peaks) every week lasts
at least a month, waiting for the next episide. Fine by me 'cause I'll
stay young longer :-)
Vickie
katefans@world.std.com
[src]
Re: ^ TWIN PEAKS QUICKIES ^ ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan.edu 1990-10-08 20:40
In article <7567@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, c2h5oh@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Idealistic Bibliomy stic) writes: > > > > In article <1990Oct3.212955.33891@eagle.wesleyan.edu> ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan. edu writes: >> >> >> >>- No question about it. The character I'd like to see most brought to TP has >> >>got to be Diane Shapiro, PhD, Brandeis. What is Hawk's current relationship >> >>with her, anyway? > > > > Diane Shapiro? DIANE Shapiro? Hmmm.... > > Nah, take off. Dont'cha think Coop woulda known if it had been her? Unless you're talking about someone else, that is... +---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Gerry Grosz | "If I had a boat, I'd go out on the ocean. If I | | ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan.edu | had a pony, I'd ride him on my boat." - L.Lovett | +---------------------------+-----------------+--------------------------------+ | "Diane, I am now holding in my hand a | I had a quote here, but I guess| | small box of chocolate bunnies." - D.Cooper | it was unoriginal. - ggrosz | +---------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+[src]
Harry Truman did it (here I go again) HARTLEBN@pucc.Princeton.EDU (Christian Albrecht Hartleben) 1990-10-08 20:42
For those of you with VCR's ....
Of course these are spoilers ! Anyway.
- Ronette stares off into the distance and has blurry vision when we
visit her in the hospital. The sketches of suspects are held by Cooper
so as to unknowingly block Truman's face from her view.
- You can hear her yelling "shhshsh" "trtrr" What do you think she's saying?
- Top shelf, behind some books, Truman's office. See the Black and white
picture, the one that looks a great deal like the sketches of Bob. Hmm.
- What is that necklace Harry is wearing? It was not there before, and it is
most definately meant to be seen this season.
Gobbledy-guk term, but hey.
- Bob is, as was rightly pointed out, the socio-viral psychological disease
of sexual molestation. He is not a specific person, he is at this point at
least several specific people. To wit:
Leland's Uncle?/Grandfather's neighbor -- molests -- Leland
Leland -- molests -- Laura
Laura -- molests -- Harold Smith (diary)
Laura (almost) "Would you like to play with BoB?" to James
and of course, Harry S Truman...... but we must wait to see why...
- You could hear Laura's voice in the reverb of James' singing before
Maddy joined in. wonderful.
- Maddy now sees visions because she has taken Laura's place in the household
as Leland's daughter. I'll even venture that the stain on the carpet was
Laura's blood from the first time she was cut, as described in the diary,
by her father raping her.
Look here, anybody who has any of TP on tape, I offer a friendly
challenge. Watch it, pretending you know that Harry is the killer.
When you find yourself complimenting Lynch/Frost on having put
all of these clues in so early, then you'll see the light.
Quick, will somebody please bet me huge sums of money? I can't find anyone to
bet with here. I accidentally convinced them all.(with the help of my ex-room-
mate.)
Chris "You can say things against Lynch but I can't heeaar you" Hartleben
[src]
Re: The Message ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan.edu 1990-10-08 20:57
In article <Oct.7.15.28.21.1990.27638@remus.rutgers.edu>, yacullo@remus.rutgers edu (Mike Yacullo) writes: > > > > Has anyone considered the possibility that the message Bobby's father > > showed Cooper was NOT from outer space, but rather some 'unseen > > force/personna/whatever' had simply used Mr. Briggs computer to send > > a message? > > > > Just my $.02 > > > > mike > > yacullo@topaz.rutgers.edu Here here! (Hear hear?) I agree, and think that it could just be a way of the Giant proving his validity to Coop. Hopefully, we'll solve the third clue this forthcoming episode, and then the Giant will tell Coop the really GOOD stuff! Just my $.015 +---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Gerry Grosz | "If I had a boat, I'd go out on the ocean. If I | | ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan.edu | had a pony, I'd ride him on my boat." - L.Lovett | +---------------------------+-----------------+--------------------------------+ | "Diane, I am now holding in my hand a | I had a quote here, but I guess| | small box of chocolate bunnies." - D.Cooper | it was unoriginal. - ggrosz | +---------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) 1990-10-08 21:08
In article <7636@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) writes: > > Don't reinterpret every new piece of evidence to insist that it proves > > this conclusion, when it does not. This is not well thought out. > > Other things about owls and BOB that aren't what they seem include that > > BOB appears as simply human in coops vision, but he is not. There's > > more to him, perhaps he's a demon, vampire, spirit, whatever. > > His powers *might* include invisibility, mind control, > > mind reading, jumping through portals that take him to and from strange Geezuz - take your own advice will ya? Maybe he's f*ckin Santa Claus too huh? My God - a few dreams/visions of a figure and suddenly he's the damn tooth fairy...... there hasn't been one piece of 'serious' evidence that there are super-natural beings in this show - only dreams, hallucinations and visions - how does this add up to mystical boogie men????? gln[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) 1990-10-08 21:08
In article <15924@bfmny0.BFM.COM>, tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) writes: > > In article <1158600093@cdp> forestwatch@cdp.UUCP writes: >> > >The owls are not what they seem. Killer Bob is an owl. >> > >Killer Bob is not what he seems (i.e., a killer). Ergo: Killer >> > >Bob did not kill Laura Palmer. > > Agreed! Well thought through. Hows about this - owls are not what they seem; cooper sees KB as an owl - so, KB is not what he seems - that is, he is not an actual person per se - he does not have long blond hair etc. - he is actually something/someone else....... > > that'd be it. Or it could still be Leo, heck why not. But I do like > > Donna for it, finally. She has the jealousy motive. They sure do seem to be playing that one up (for this one episode at least). Is there anything in the diary that would point to Donna as a possible future killer??? gln[src]
Re: Gum phz%cadence.com@AWIWUW11.WU-Wien.AC.AT (Pete Zakel) 1990-10-08 21:09
rbj@uunet.UU.NET (Root Boy Jim Cottrell) writes:
> >I just bought some Black Jack (and Clove) gum today. I asked the counter
> >guy how long it had been there, and he said it was a special promo
> >thing that was for a limited time only.
Black Jack, Clove and Beeman's gums are all made only in limited quantities.
You frequently see them only once a year.
They have all been around as long as I can remember, but are frequently
hard to find due to the limited quantities.
Beeman's and Clove are my two favorite flavors of chewing gum.
-Pete Zakel
(phz@cadence.com or ..!{hpda,versatc,apollo,ucbcad,uunet}!cadence!phz)
Perhaps the owls are actually manufacturers of chewing gum?
[src]
Rosemary's (OOPS!) Lucy's Baby ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan.edu 1990-10-08 21:23
-------------> POTENTIAL SPOILER <------------- Okay. I'm not sure where I heard this. Someplace reliable, I'm pretty sure. Anyway, supposedly, Lucy's having this affair with some manager over at Horne's Dept. Store. (No, I don't think it's Emory.) Sorry if I can't give any more info. But that's what I heard, and I'm sure we'll be seeing it on TP soon enough. +---------------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ | Gerry Grosz | "If I had a boat, I'd go out on the ocean. If I | | ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan.edu | had a pony, I'd ride him on my boat." - L.Lovett | +---------------------------+-----------------+--------------------------------+ | "Diane, I am now holding in my hand a | I had a quote here, but I guess| | small box of chocolate bunnies." - D.Cooper | it was unoriginal. - ggrosz | +---------------------------------------------+--------------------------------+[src]
Lucy's Baby jespah%milton.u.washington.edu@AWIWUW11.WU-Wien.AC.AT (Kathleen Hunt) 1990-10-08 23:32
katefans@world.std.com (Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago) writes: *3) Ok, so who's Lucy been sleeping with? *(long, admirably complete list deleted) You forgot some possibilities: 1) Lucy is going to give birth to the Messiah! Another Immaculate Conception! 2) Lucy, like some insects and at least two reptile species, has developed a way to do parthenogenesis. This means she will give birth to a clone of herself. 3) Lucy has been impregnated by a space alien, just like on "Star Trek: The Next Generation" when Counselor Troi was impregnated by a glowing ball of light. 4) Lucy is going through a false pregnancy. 5) Lucy's lab results were mixed up at the hospital -- actually, it is Donna/Maddy/Norma/Shelly/etc. who is pregnant. 6) Lucy actually has an abdominal tumor (this has actually happened to real people -- they thought they were pregnant but they actually had a tumor). 7) Andy's lab results were mixed up at the sperm bank, and it is actually Harry/Hank/Leo/Bobby/etc. who is sterile. I'm sure you guys can come up with others... Jespah[src]
Favorite Quotes jespah%milton.u.washington.edu@AWIWUW11.WU-Wien.AC.AT (Kathleen Hunt) 1990-10-08 23:33
Someone asked a while ago if people had favorite quotes from Twin Peaks. Well, I haven't seen anything yet so I am offering my services. Send your favorite quotes to me & I'll compile and post them. Jespah (I can't believe I actually thought I was going to do serious work when I got to graduate school! I wonder if I could declare "Twin Peaks" one of my areas of specialization for my orals...physiology, animal behavior, endocrinology, and Twin Peaks...why not?)[src]
Good Owl Theories Wanted (Must Be Sorta Rational) jespah%milton.u.washington.edu@AWIWUW11.WU-Wien.AC.AT (Kathleen Hunt) 1990-10-08 23:35
[I tried to post this before but don't know if it got on...] Okay, WHAT'S WITH THE OWLS?!!! I only got access to this board last week, so if you have all been over the owls already, please let me know what you think. Owl references that I can remember from last season include: 1) In the premiere, when James and Donna are burying the half-heart (while Jacoby watched), a great horned owl was watching them. In fact, I thought maybe that when Sarah Palmer "saw" Jacoby taking the necklace, perhaps she was seeing through the eyes of the great horned owl. 2) When Cooper et al. visited the Log Lady, she said something to the effect of "The owls can't see us here" when she invited them inside. Later, as she described what her log had seen, she said something about owls making noise or owls watching, and then said that later on (after the screaming), "the owls were silent". Does anyone have a complete transcript of everything the Log Lady has said? The only thing I remember clearly is "My husband was a logging man. He met the devil. Fire is the devil, hiding like a coward in the smoke." [I loved last week's "You wear shiny objects on your chest. Are you proud?"] 3) The Giant then said "the owls are not what they seem". I think this was the first time the owls became obviously important to the plot. 4) Later, the Major showed Cooper a message from outer space saying "the owls are not what they seem", presumably a confirmation of the Giant's clue. 5) In a dream later that night, Cooper saw a great horned owl superimposed over BOB's face. So what gives? The obvious answer is that the Log Lady's "owls" are not what they seem. Does this mean they weren't owls at all, but were actually people (i.e., other people wandering around in the woods, like maybe the Bookhouse Boys) that the Log Lady insists on calling owls? Does it mean they ARE owls, but special, spiritual owls, as in "I heard the owl call my name"? Maybe all the Log Lady means is that she heard hooting. What else could have been hooting? I want owl theories. Get cracking, everyone. :-) Jespah[src]
re: Did Episode 1... jespah%milton.u.washington.edu@AWIWUW11.WU-Wien.AC.AT (Kathleen Hunt) 1990-10-08 23:35
[tried to post this before, don't know if it got on] bmay@chips.com (Brad May) Message-ID: <599@news.chips.com> complains: *Andy goes from lovable bumbler to total moron: scene with roll of tape, *talk with Lucy "They informed me I was sterile which I thought meant I *didn't need to take a bath." (aprox. quote). SHEESH! Same for Lucy. *Note after she pulls tape off Andy's head she is still trying to get it *off her own fingers when scene cuts. Also where she hangs up on caller. *Some of this is funny, my point is that all the deveopment of these char- *acters is scrapped and they become one-dimensional stereotypes. I totally agree with this. I was really annoyed by some scenes in the season premiere, too -- Andy staggering around like an owl on DDT (yes, I have seen an owl on DDT), for instance. Truman, Lucy, et al. were also acting strangely; I found it odd that when Cooper woke up after having been shot three times(!) NONE of them asked how he was! I felt like that friendship that had been growing between Cooper and Truman was just something I had imagined. *Albert has lost his cynical edge. We loose a great character and foil for *Cooper's character. No, this I don't agree with. I *love* Albert! I especially loved how he said "So, has anyone seen Bob on earth in the last few weeks?" He's like an anchor of cynicism and relative normality in a swirling sea of magicians and owls. Especially now that Twin Peaks seems to be wheeling off into weirder and weirder things -- which I like, actually -- Albert's unshakable twentieth-century skepticism is more and more important. "King Hohoho"!! Albert is great! *It looks like the "Without chemicals he points" clue refers to Leland *(without hair dye) pointing at BOB's poster in Ben Horne office. Wait -- Leland never has used hair dye, has he? So why would he be any more "without chemicals" than any of the other characters? *There is still funny stuff: Opening scene, Cooper expounding on 5th century *Tibetan Bhuddism while barbershop quarted sings. Scene with stools in *Ronette'sroom was classic Lynch. But while we get a couple good scenes, the *plot goes to hell, and the show is drifting. Yeah, I loved that barbershop quarter and those STOOLS! Especially since I once TA'd a lab class where all the stools were that kind. They're really difficult to figure out. I must have demonstrated how to lower those stools about fifty times. And overall, I really liked the 1st episode. Once you accept the fact that it's getting spacier and spacier, you can enjoy it even more. After all, this is FICTION. How many of you saw "Alien" or "Back to the Future" and sat there grumbling "This isn't possible! Time travel is a ridiculous idea! Extraterrestrials indeed! This is too flaky for me!" Few, I'll bet. You just accept that it's fiction, and enjoy the ride. The only thing that's bugging me is the growing two-dimensionality (? shrinking three-dimensionality? flattening two-dimensionality?) of some of the supporting characters, namely Lucy and Andy. *Or am I just cranky because I have to go back to work? You're just cranky. :-) Jespah[src]
Theresa Banks/Fleshworld? horny@ucscb.ucsc.edu (Michael Kaye) 1990-10-08 23:54
More stuff from ze diary. Lucy and Andy are scanning fleshworlds for Theresa Banks. I think they might find the very page of fleshworld Jacques gives to Laura. pg. 120 around christmas 87' [jacques gives a christmas present to laura] "..When I opened it, I realized the wrapper was a folded, torn-out page from Fleshworld, showing a guy built kind of like Jaqcues, kneeling in front of a really pretty blond girl. I think she was the prettiest girl I'd ever seen in that magazine. In the photo, this girl was almost naked with a parrot on her shoulder, and the man was kissing her feet like he adored her. At the bottom of the page, Jacques had written, "Thinking of you, fantasy girl." hum. Maybe the girl in the picture is Theresa Banks, and the guy who is built "kind of like Jacques" is Jacques. Laura has a similar picture of her taken at the Jacques cabin, with a mynah bird on her shoulder. Not that I know what to make of any of this or anything :) It would give a previously non-existant connection between Laura and Theresa, and maybe Jacques. Michael Kaye horny@ucscb.ucsc.edu "Say it isn't so Krusty!"[src]
Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? brianm@typhoon.Berkeley.EDU (Brian Markenson) 1990-10-09 00:39
In article <26165@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) writes: > > > >Also, why would they fire Laura from OEJ's for drug use???!!!?? The whole > >place is full of druggies and is managed by a junkie? I don't think she WAS fired for drug use...that was just a convenient excuse. Blackie didn't like her anymore. At least, that's the impression that I got. Brian[src]
Re: Quickies on Season Premiere seanf@sco.COM (Sean Fagan) 1990-10-09 01:39
In article <1990Oct2.031402.20048@alembic.acs.com> csu@alembic.acs.com (Dave Mack) writes: > >In article <1990Oct1.143739@cs.Buffalo.EDU> mathews@cs.Buffalo.EDU (Ryan D Mathews) writes: >> >>"There is a man in a smiling bag" I was waiting to see a man in a Glad bag... 8-) > >"One has seen the third man. Three have seen him, yes... but not his > >body. One only, known to you, ready to speak." > > > >The three who have seen the third man are Sarah Palmer and Cooper > >himself, in visions. The third, of course, is Ronette Pulaski who > >is out of her coma and ready to speak. Now here's where I want to disagree. Ronette is *not* ready to speak; remember Cooper's comment to Albert about her not being able to talk yet? I have a hard time believing that this was something overlooked by Lynch and Frost; so what could it mean? -- -----------------+ Sean Eric Fagan | "Never knock on Death's door: ring the bell and seanf@sco.COM | run away! Death really hates that!" uunet!sco!seanf | -- Dr. Mike Stratford (Matt Frewer, "Doctor, Doctor") (408) 458-1422 | Any opinions expressed are my own, not my employers'.[src]
Re: Killer Bob Ain't What He Seems horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) 1990-10-09 03:16
In article <26178@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) writes: > >In article <7636@darkstar.ucsc.edu>, horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) writes: >> >> Don't reinterpret every new piece of evidence to insist that it proves >> >> this conclusion, when it does not. This is not well thought out. > > >> >> Other things about owls and BOB that aren't what they seem include that >> >> BOB appears as simply human in coops vision, but he is not. There's >> >> more to him, perhaps he's a demon, vampire, spirit, whatever. >> >> His powers *might* include invisibility, mind control, >> >> mind reading, jumping through portals that take him to and from strange > > > >Geezuz - take your own advice will ya? Maybe he's f*ckin Santa Claus too huh? > >My God - a few dreams/visions of a figure and suddenly he's the damn tooth > >fairy...... there hasn't been one piece of 'serious' evidence that there > >are super-natural beings in this show - only dreams, hallucinations and > >visions - how does this add up to mystical boogie men????? > >gln Yeah! Tell him! HAhA! Your Santa Claus theory is correct! I've seen the light! So help me BOB! Sarah Palmer, Madeline, Laura and even Leland all have had visions of BOB because they were victimized by Santa Claus as children, forced to chant horribly tacky rhymes and pray to fat bearded men. You know that vision of Ronette's where BOB is violently thrusting up and down? IT ISN'T WHAT IT SEEMS!! BOB actually is stuffing Ronette's stocking, which was a little tight for his large knockwurst sausage. Why is BOB so terrifying? HE KNOWS IF YOU'VE BEEN NAUGHTY OR NICE. Think about it!! In the diary BOB admits to knowing all, seeing all! Laura strives to reform, but she cannot, so well BOB (santa claus) has no choice but to teach her a lesson. Laura's obsessive behaivior leads her to take inordinate amounts of cocaine BECAUSE IT REMINDS HER OF THE SNOW ASSOCIATED WITH HER BELOVED (and yet dreaded) SANTA CLAUS. Laura takes sadistic pleasure in taking secret trips to the woods to hunt deer and eat venison, and even sneaks off to NRA meetings. I don't know where you got that tooth fairy idea though. You know, you are really out there sometimes. Michael Kaye horny@ucscb.ucsc.edu[src]
Re: The Kid Magician wwd@cellar.uucp (Bill Donahue) 1990-10-09 04:15
How come Mrs Tremont (et Pierre!) are NOT the `Dumont's???? Maybe Major Briggs is going to buy the farm soon?? I.e. his vision relates a type of passing on to his son, and relating the extragalactic message rather completes his purpose in life?? (What is anyone's purpose in life anyway?) What happened to the eerie background music?[src]
The Major tel@adimail.UUCP (Terry Monks) 1990-10-09 06:05
As far as I can see from reading the newsgroup, everyone accepts what the Major is saying. I think it's possible the Major is as weird as anyone else, why not? After all, what he shows Cooper is what some of us would call his 'log.' So his log has a message for Agent Cooper. There is no real indication that there is a secret installation in Twin Peaks, is there? I cannot recall having seen anyone else in uniform. And people with classified information will (usually) not pass it out, even to repected FBI agents that they have met for the first time in a diner, yet alone remove calssified documents from their place of work. I have to believe this is another red-herring. -- Terry Monks Automata Design Inc (703) 472-9400[src]
Re: Did Episode 1 Stink, or What? v22964qs@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike Cluff) 1990-10-09 06:19
> >bmay@chips.com (Brad May) writes: >> >>Is is just me, or is anybody else very dissapointed in Episode 1 (10-6)? [reasons deleted, some good, some bad] Yup, count me in. The thing that pissed me off the most was the outrageously stupid musical scene. ****************************************************************************** Mike Cluff* One who knows does not post; v22964qs@ubvms or mike%luick@ubvms* One who posts does not know. UB Language Perception Laboratory* (apologies to Lao Tzu) ******************************************************************************[src]
Re: creamed corn! [cellophane tape] zeus@aerospace.aero.org (Dave Suess) 1990-10-09 06:53
In article <2844@jaytee.East.Sun.COM> msmiller@Sun.COM (Mark Miller) writes: > >And Andy fighting with the tape. Another cute little sight gag. What struck me about that scene was not a sight gag -- it was a sound gag. Radio's customary use for cellophane was to create the sound effect ... of a fire, crackling and popping. Note that while the crackling goes on (and on), the poster for BOB is prominent next to Andy. Dave Suesszeus@aerospace.aero.org[src]
Who *really* attacked Ronette? donham@prarie.enet.dec.com 1990-10-09 07:06
I just realized something. Ronette's vision of the scene at the railroad car is what *Ronette* saw. I predict that we will learn that *Laura* attacked Ronette. Ronette remembers Laura as pure evil. Perhaps Laura was trying to kill her as a present to BOB, but something happened...too muck coke ala Len Bias, maybe. Ronette escaped while BOB tried to revive Laura. - Perry Donham Educational Services "Vulcans never bluff." Digital Equip. Corp. -Spock -[src]
Re: The Message muffy@remarque.berkeley.edu (Muffy Barkocy) 1990-10-09 07:41
In article <1990Oct8.225740.34102@eagle.wesleyan.edu> ggrosz@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes: In article <Oct.7.15.28.21.1990.27638@remus.rutgers.edu>, yacullo@remus.rutgers edu (Mike Yacullo) writes: > Has anyone considered the possibility that the message Bobby's father > showed Cooper was NOT from outer space, but rather some 'unseen > force/personna/whatever' had simply used Mr. Briggs computer to send > a message? I agree, and think that it could just be a way of the Giant proving his validity to Coop. Hopefully, we'll solve the third clue this forthcoming episode, and then the Giant will tell Coop the really GOOD stuff! Indeed, it is very likely that the message was added after the transmission was received. The entire printout contained slash, letter, digit, digit, digit, slash, etc. There weren't any other combinations of letters that I could see (someone could check this by freeze-framing, if you care). So, it seems that none of the space-noise is being translated into anything resembling words. If this is true, and all the noise becomes these letter-and-three-digit symbols, there would be no way of sending a signal which would become the message to Cooper. On the other hand, it would be trivial (well, comparatively) to insert the appropriate characters into the file which was printed or into the data being sent to the printer -- probably into the file, since I would think that would be the first thing they would check...that the printout matched what was printed. Muffy[src]
Re: Various odd thoughts... ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) 1990-10-09 07:43
f) Until Lynch tells us who it is, the only way to get clues is
to re-watch the earlier episodes and look for a place where
Lucy seems uncomfortable with someone. Can anyone think of an
instance?
ALBERT!
[src]
"Duress! Dress!" (what does Ronette say?) sandell@ils.nwu.edu (Greg Sandell) 1990-10-09 07:47
When Cooper showed Ronette Pulaski the drawing of Bob, while freaking out she kept saying the same word over and over again. It sounded like "duress" (as in "she was held under duress") or "dress." Any clues in that? **************************************************************** * Greg Sandell (sandell@ils.nwu.edu) Evanston, IL * * Institute for the Learning Sciences, Northwestern University * ****************************************************************[src]
Re: TP: Confusion about Mill ledgers dv0o+@andrew.cmu.edu (Doug vanderVeen) 1990-10-09 08:01
I was confused by B &J's ledger discussion at first too, until I realized that Ben is lieing to his brother. Doug[src]
Re: Leland recognizing BOB dd@sei.cmu.edu (Dennis Doubleday) 1990-10-09 08:16
horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) writes: >> >> I agree with those posters who have identified Jerry Horne as BOB (brother >> >>of Ben). > > > >Jerry is one of the few characters we can near absolutely rule out. > >He was in France when Laura was murdered. So HE says. I don't believe we've ever been offerred any independent confirmation of same. In fact, Jerry has been my prime suspect since he was introduced, because his alibi is apparently airtight and there has been no investigation of him. It's not really a valid reason, but I also suspected him because of external associations--the actor, David Patrick Kelly, always plays anti-social creeps, most memorably in "The Warriors." -- Dennis Doubleday (dd@sei.cmu.edu) _ /| Software Engineering Institute \'o.O' Carnegie Mellon University ACK! PTHFT! =(___)= Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (412)268-5873 U[src]
Little Boy = Magician luksa@ils.nwu.edu (Frank Luksa) 1990-10-09 08:18
"Through the darkness of future past the magician longs to see One chants out between two worlds Fire, walk with me." So, is the little boy with the creamed corn the Magician mentioned above? Frank.[src]
Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker) 1990-10-09 08:46
In article <26165@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) writes: > >Also, why would they fire Laura from OEJ's for drug use???!!!?? The whole place > >is full of druggies and is managed by a junkie? Perhaps Laura's drug use was so severe that she couldn't function in her capacity as "hospitality girl". -- Scott Amspoker Basis International, Albuquerque, NM (505) 345-5232 unmvax.cs.unm.edu!bbx!bbxsda!scott[src]
Re: TWIN PEAKS Second Season Premiere - THE GIANT's VOICE pbhx@ellis.uchicago.edu (Peter B. Hayward) 1990-10-09 08:49
In article <12973@sdcc6.ucsd.edu> ma299ai@sdcc6.ucsd.edu (Jan Bielawski) writes: > >In article <1990Oct4.013458.16639@supernet.haus.com> cluther@supernet.haus.com (Clay Luther) writes: > >< > ><Yes, the giant's voice did fade in and out, in regular intervals, and in > ><three volume states. He would be loud for about a second, normal for about > ><a second, quiet for a second, normal, and loud again, until he stopped > ><talking. > > > >Not here. The giant's voice stayed at the same volume throughout. > >I suspect the fade in/out effect had something to do with the surround > >encoding. Maybe it tricked some cable boxes into raising/lowering the > >volume. > > For those tracking the sound drops (which also occurred in the first season), I have been able to establish the following. The giant's voice did *not* drop out as viewed on a Rochester, New York cable system. The voice *did* drop in the Chicago area on *both* cable and over-the-air broadcasts. So, I am pretty certain it is not a Lynch trick. Perhaps it has something to do with the network satellite feed to the midwest (and maybe points west.) -- --------------------------- Peter B. Hayward N9IZT University of Chicago Computing Organizations Marriage proposals considered Tuesdays and Fridays from 1 pm to 8 pm[src]
Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? raveling@unify.com (Paul Raveling) 1990-10-09 09:17
In article <1990Oct9.073905.21399@agate.berkeley.edu>, brianm@typhoon.Berkeley.EDU (Brian Markenson) writes: > > In article <26165@megaron.cs.arizona.edu> gln@cs.arizona.edu (Gary Newell) > > writes: >> > > >> > >Also, why would they fire Laura from OEJ's for drug use???!!!?? The whole >> > >place is full of druggies and is managed by a junkie? > > > > I don't think she WAS fired for drug use...that was just a convenient > > excuse. Blackie didn't like her anymore. At least, that's the impression > > that I got. As per the diary, Laura and Blackie had a pecking order beef, with Blackie claiming to be the most adept of anyone in the house at their business. Laura took a dare and showed Blackie up in a lesbian encounter by bringing her to the brink of purportedly incredible ecstasy, proving that Laura was the better of the two. Then Laura walked away without finishing this business, leaving Blackie frustrated and furious. ------------------ Paul Raveling Raveling@Unify.com[src]
Re: Re: this 'n' that raj@hpfcso.HP.COM (Bob Jewett) 1990-10-09 09:26
> > 13) My theory, which is mine, is that Colonel Mustard did it in the > > Lounge, with the Candlestick. Which reminds me, Bobby's dad is most > > certainly a Major and not a Colonel. He's got oak leaves on his shoulders, > > not eagles. So he's a Major, okay? Not OK. Brass Oak Leaves - Major Silver Oak Leaves - Lt. Colonel Silver Eagles - Full Colonel I agree they are oak leaves, but what flavor? Bob[src]
Calm speculation (was Re: Wild Speculation) blk@mitre.org (Brian L. Kahn) 1990-10-09 09:33
All things considered (more or less) I think the biggest clue we have so far is Jennifer Lynch (author of Laura's Diary) being quoted somewhere that she thinks people will be really surprised when they find out who the killer is. Ben Horne is NOT surprising. Neither is Leo. Neither Ben nor Leo did it, guaranteed. -- B< Brian Kahn blk@security.mitre.org "may the farce be with you"[src]
Put that oven on bake raj@hpfcso.HP.COM (Bob Jewett) 1990-10-09 09:39
With all of these half-baked theories coming out, I suppose it's time for
a few that are fully baked (Yeah I saw the Graduate). :-)
1. Pete Martell knows more about what is going on than most folks think.
"She's dead, wrapped in plastic." The body is face down in pretty
non-see-through plastic. How'd old Pete know it was a she?
2. The fingernail letters 'T' and 'R' are spelling out 'Trollop' and
provide a definite link to Flesh World.
Bob [mostly a :-)]
[src]
Misc. things... rcarter@isis.cs.du.edu (Ron Carter) 1990-10-09 09:56
A few scatter misc. observations. TP is about ( among *lots* of other things ) dualities and dichotomies. The twin ( 3! ) sets of Mike and Bob teams. Also is about the seen ( good ) and hidden(!) ( evil ). When something is missing it is always the left ( evil ) hand side. We are given clues on how to view clues. The Major tells us about visions. Albert points out that -nobody- has -really- seen Killer Bob. He just appears in visions. Beware of visions. Maybe Cooper et al tranfers the presence of Mike ( shoe saleman ) and Bob ( the vet ) to the visionary ( dream state ) Mike ( one armed man ) and Killer Bob. More misc. Was that Jerry behind the tree ( last season ) when Leo was ( not ) picking up the drugs from Bobby ( "Leo needs a new pair of shoes?" ). Watch for a Hong Kong/Josie/drug connection. Why is everyone sure that Leo put the drugs under the boards? Bobby is our horticulturist ( a plant expert ) and sure wanted Leo out of the way. And maybe Bobby popped the transient for the Hank/Josie deal? And whate is the connection between the Major and Hank? Vietnam, drugs? The killer is Leland. Logic as follows: Were definately sexual feelings ( on some level ) twixt him and Laura. He finds out about her cabin escapade and follows, etc. The Log Lady seems a prime candidate for "the one who saw..." Some musings. Is Cooper getting dumber, or what? Loss of blood? Wish Nadine had different patches for outfits. ( A white satin patch! ) And betcha that was her prom dance dress. Leland's white hair might be so people can tell Leland from Ben. Possibly saw smiling bag before in morgue one armed man soliloquy. Leland shot Cooper as well. Only one walking that night. Look for Leland/Mattie interaction. Got the second episode on tape? Fast forward ( watching ) the hospital scene with Shelley, Doc and Coma Leo. Weird slow motion strobing. And yeppers, that is SON-O-LYNCH holding the cream corn. She's been hyp-no-tized... And they better start "telling" some stuff, or TP will be canceled. Ron ( rcarter@isis.cs.du.edu ) "Think of it as evolution in process..."[src]
Re: Quickies on Season Premiere paul@taniwha.UUCP (Paul Campbell) 1990-10-09 09:57
In article <7484@darkstar.ucsc.edu> c2h5oh@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Idealistic Bibliomystic) writes: > >Cooper: Where did you come from? > >Giant: The question is, where have you _gone_. > >Many ways to interpret this, but the general atmosphere makes me > >think that the giant has not come to Cooper, but that Cooper has > >reached some new place or stage, similar to his dream-state but Or it could be a reference to Cooper's past. This week's show talked about Cooper's now crazy ex-partner who has escaped from the hospital he was being kept in ..... it could be foreshadowing his appearance in the show .... Paul -- Paul Campbell UUCP: ..!mtxinu!taniwha!paul AppleLink: CAMPBELL.P What most people don't realize is that those plastic cover slips that your 3 inch floppies come in are actually condoms for protecting your computer from harmfull computer viruses - practice safe computing ..... :-)[src]
Re: How Did you Know A.J. Lynch is named P.T.? sherman@oak.math.ucla.edu (William Sherman) 1990-10-09 10:08
In article <9777@ur-cc.UUCP> clc5_ltd@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (BOB) writes: > > Yummy Fir, As in, Big Ed the Happy Clown!!!! B^) Sorry. Bill Sherman sherman@math.ucla.edu Just on the border of your waking mind, there lies another time where darkness and light are one; and as you tread the halls of sanity, you feel so glad to be unable to go beyond. I have a message from another time. -ELO[src]
POSSIBLE SPOILER on cast member rclayton@urbana.mcd.mot.com (Randy Clayton) 1990-10-09 10:17
What follows is an article from last Friday's New York Times that may have a spoiler in it (it does not indicate who killed LP, by the way).[src]
What the Magician said bgm@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca (Bruce Matthews) 1990-10-09 10:34
The French words spoken by the "magician" were: C'est un homme sur de terre. Which means: It is a man underground. This appears to relate to what we have heard about the European version of TP in which Killer BOB is found to be hiding (living?) in the basement of the hospital. Any other guesses given this translation? -- Bruce G. Matthews, P.Eng. Be - as a page that aches for a word BGM Human Factors Engineering which speaks on a theme that is timeless. bgm@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca - Neil Diamond from J.L.S.[src]
Re: creamed corn! 6sigma2@polari.UUCP (Brian Matthews) 1990-10-09 10:48
In article <39395@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu (Paul Graham) writes: |but i was right about the space aliens. There are lots of down-to-earth (:-)) ways the message to Cooper could have got into Major Briggs' reams of gibberish. It wasn't necessarily actually from aliens. -- Brian L. Matthews blm@6sceng.UUCP[src]
Re: Enterprise to Star Fleet Command starpath@athena.mit.edu (David E Hollingsworth) 1990-10-09 10:50
In article <1990Oct8.213209.16790@athena.mit.edu>, patl@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti) writes: |> In article <12627789439009@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU> |> PUTNAM-L@OSU-20.IRCC.OHIO-STATE.EDU (Lee Putnam) writes: |> > |> > -Lynch has entered the realm of sci-fi and that is great. I now intend to sit |> > back and watch many of you bicker about the "absurdity" of TP. |> |> Entering the realm of sci-fi is fine, as long as it's GOOD sci-fi. The |> "message from outer space" scene, with Cooper's awe-struck "Oh, my God" |> could have come from any bad B movie. Oh, come off it! Lynch makes fun of soap operas the first season (Cooper says something like "I only have two questions: who shot J.R....", _Invitation to Love_, etc.) and it is acceptable to most people. In the second season he satirizes (bad, as you say) sci-fi (the giant, the space aliens, BOB, the log lady...it's starting to sound like a bad "Twilight Zone" episode, actually) and everyone suddenly starts taking him seriously. Didn't the very first scene of the season opener clue you in at all; take all this stuff with a grain of salt. |> IM(not so)HO, Lynch has gravely misjudged his audience in throwing this |> trash at us. No longer just adding spice, the supernatural has taken |> over the show. Perhaps he has misjudged the audience. My guess is that he felt that after the first season he would have an audience that would be able to roll with the punches without crying uncle. |> Aside from one-liners, Twin Peaks just isn't that good this season. Then don't watch it and quit whining. |> -Pat |> "Has anyone seen Bob on earth in the last few weeks?"[src]
Re: Leland recognizing BOB 6sigma2@polari.UUCP (Brian Matthews) 1990-10-09 10:54
In article <7581@darkstar.ucsc.edu> horny@ucscb.UCSC.EDU (Michael Kaye) writes: |Jerry is one of the few characters we can near absolutely rule out. |He was in France when Laura was murdered. It wouldn't be the first time that a character that was supposedly out of the country flew back early, committed the crime, and then appeared later as if he/she had just arrived back. |Ben is the one who suggests eliminating Leland, not Jerry. |Was Ben serious when he suggested killing Leland? Or was he just |making a smart crack, prompted by Lelands counter productive phone call? I think he was just frustrated at another screw-up by Leland, especially after how strange Leland has been acting lately. In one of last season's shows, Ben tells Jerry something like "get a net, and get him out of here". He was obviously upset then at Leland. Also, Leland seemed to be headed for the sheriff right after he recognized BOB, so they'd have to hurry to catch him, which they didn't. -- Brian L. Matthews blm@6sceng.UUCP[src]
Re: 10/6/90 episode 6sigma2@polari.UUCP (Brian Matthews) 1990-10-09 11:00
In article <1990Oct7.214640.1173@theep.boston.ma.us> maj@theep.boston.ma.us (Meryl A. Joseph) writes: |Just a few basic thoughts: | - - I am curious why no one has mentioned the extremely likely |possibility that BOB is the mysterious shut-in "Mr. Smith", Laura's |"friend" on the Meals on Wheels program. This was discussed a few weeks ago. As with most theories, there wasn't any consensus. Some things point to him being BOB, others indicate there's no way he could be BOB. |- - Does Shelly really want Leo as a vegetable at home with her, so |she and Bobby can "hang donuts from his ears?" Scaarry kids! $5000 a month can be a great incentive. |- - Something interesting - - Maddy got rid of her glasses, and still |is hallucinating re: scary stuff and Killer BOBs. This could be evidence that Laura is alive. She killed Maddy and took over her life to try to escape from BOB. But BOB found her anyways. On the other hand, I don't think Laura would have been as frightened of BOB as Maddy. Near the end of her diary, Laura seems to have come to terms somewhat with BOB, where she still hated him, but wasn't really afraid of him. On the third hand :-), if Laura thought she had got away from BOB, she might be that frightened when she discovers she hasn't. |- - Some great one-liners last night. My personal favorite: Jerry |to Ben Horne: "I am 100% certain that we are not sure!" Jerry's one of my favorite characters. He's always saying fun things, and he certainly loves to eat and party! -- Brian L. Matthews blm@6sceng.UUCP[src]
Re: Misc. things... hallyb@globbo.enet.dec.com (John Hallyburton) 1990-10-09 11:42
rcarter@isis.cs.du.edu (Ron Carter) writes... > >Why is everyone sure that Leo put the drugs under the boards? Bobby is > >our horticulturist ( a plant expert ) and sure wanted Leo out of the way. Bobby didn't have any drugs at the time. Remember Leo in the forest? If Bobby had that much dope he woulda offered some to Leo just not to get shot. Plus the connection between Leo's needing a new pair of boots is just a bit too obvious. > >And whate is the connection between the Major and Hank? Vietnam, drugs? Why does there have to be a connection? Maybe Hank is just putting on his good side. Though it would be interesting to have a 'Nam drug connection... > >The killer is Leland. Logic as follows: [deleted] The killer is not Leland. Logic as follows: Theresa Banks was killed elsewhere in the state. Nobody in Twin Peaks would commit a second similar crime that close to home. Of course if you postulate mental illness then anybody can be guilty... "Without chemicals he points" is a reference to Leo. Logic as follows: "Smiling bag" refers to Jacques as we have seen, "Owls" are likely a reference to Killer Bob given the owlface in Cooper's dream. It would make sense to identify the 3rd of 3 men involved with Laura the night of her death. This is all the giant's way of telling Cooper the giant knows who is involved, and we can expect to see further clarifying (?) clues in the future. Maybe Audrey's fan club should form a vigilante posse and rescue her from OEJs. John, speaking for myself[src]
a few observations (minor and major) pouncy@campus.swarthmore.edu 1990-10-09 11:47
-Message-Text-Follows- we've just caught with the heavy message flow and have a few quck observations. 1. Waiter who comes across Cooper on floor is mad in THE SEARCHERS and keeps saying "thank you, thank you kindly". But in same movie John Wayne and partner meet mad woman in fort who has been tortured by Indians. In her arms she cradles a log as if it were a baby. There has been a very strong Indian imagery in TP, particularly at beginning. Violation of sacred forests (Ghostwood Estates), nature, etc. 2. "The owls are not what they seem." In cheap pulp fiction a line like that would mean that men in the forest are making owl noises. Also, the technical term for an owl's ears is "horns". 3. The main problem with the first show was that it was two hours long. TP should stick to one-hour slot. 4. Anybody notice the 2001 food in the hospital with a kick! Prelude to sci-fi imagery in subsequent episode. 5. Ronnette Pulaski=Roman Polanski. Rosemary's Baby about to arrive? 6. Paramount Picture contrasted with Twin Peaks. Look at logo for town on billboard on outskirts and then examine logo of Paramount Pictures. Very similar. But Lynchian duality contrasted with monolithic (paramount) Hollywood fare. 7. Fire can destroy wood but ice can put out fire and ice can also be melted by fire but ice can't hurt wood (like paper, scissors, stone). The Hornes sit at the center of the ice-fire-wood nexus. Ben and Jerry's icecream, "we have to burn SOMETHING" (plus arson of mill), and they want to control the woods (mill and Ghostwood Estates). Also both are dealing with the Icelanders who "live above the timberline". Characters in TP can be divided according to wood (e.g. the log lady), fire (e.g. Donna who now smokes) and ice (e.g. Mr Frosty getting his "rocks" off). The shows key resolutions are a) the woods will win by being preserved from the ravages of man b) it will end in a great conflagration which will make the burning of the mill look like a boyscouts' bonfire c) the Icelanders and their like will build Ghostwood and still the town's passions and torments. In any case, the brothers Horne will be at the center of the final resolution. Diarmuid Maguire Hillard Pouncy[src]
Re: Calm speculation (was Re: Wild Speculation) starpath@athena.mit.edu (David E Hollingsworth) 1990-10-09 12:02
In article <BLK.90Oct9123309@vanity.mitre.org>, blk@mitre.org (Brian L. Kahn) writes: |> |> All things considered (more or less) I think the biggest clue we have |> so far is Jennifer Lynch (author of Laura's Diary) being quoted |> somewhere that she thinks people will be really surprised when they |> find out who the killer is. Ben Horne is NOT surprising. Neither is |> Leo. Neither Ben nor Leo did it, guaranteed. |> |> -- |> B< Brian Kahn blk@security.mitre.org "may the farce be with you" Isn't there a logic problem called something like the "hangman's paradox"? I think it goes like this: The guilty party is told by the judge that he will be executed at dawn some day within the next week, but that he [the guilty party] will not know when this will occur until that very day. After thinking about this for some time, the guilty party recognizes something: he cannot be executed on the last day of the week. After all, if the first 6 mornings pass without incident, then he will know late into the 6th day that he execution must happen "tommorrow". However, the judge told him that he would not know until the day it is going to happen. Likewise, once the first 5 mornings pass by, the prisoner will know that, because he cannot be executed on the 7th day, the only day left is the 6th. But then again, he would have the foreknowledge that the judge's statement claimed that he would not have. The same argument continues until we discover that his execution must occur on the very next day, but that it cannot, because he has just concluded so, and therefore "knows" that it must be the day. Therefore the prisoner is content the knowing that the sentence cannot be carried out, because it is paradoxical. Now here's the neat part. Because the prisoner has "proved" that none of the days may be "the big one", they are all fair game. The prisoner will be equally surprised no matter which day it occurs because he believes that the event cannot happen at all. By logically analyzing the situation, he has reduced it to the original scenerio. So if you assume that neither Ben nor Leo did it, "guaranteed", then you will definitely be surprised if either one DOES turn out to be the killer...thus making Jennifer's statement true. So much for the "biggest clue we have so far"... David E. Hollingsworth[src]
Re: TP: Confusion about Mill ledgers bobg+@andrew.cmu.edu (Robert Steven Glickstein) 1990-10-09 12:09
Excerpts from netnews.alt.tv.twin-peaks: 9-Oct-90 Re: TP: Confusion about Mil.. Doug vanderVeen@andrew.c (116) > > I was confused by B &J's ledger discussion at first too, until I realized > > that Ben is lieing to his brother. I don't believe that, mainly because the way Ben said it, it doesn't make any sense even as a lie. "The real ledger, masterminded by Catherine..." You don't mastermind a real ledger, you mastermind a phony ledger. Real ledgers just happen. Could this be another continuity slip, like the AB- blood and the superfast lunar cycle? Oh, how distressing. ______________ _____________________________ Bob Glickstein | Internet: bobg@andrew.cmu.edu Information Technology Center | Bitnet: bobg%andrew@cmuccvma.bitnet Carnegie Mellon University | UUCP: ...!harvard!andrew.cmu.edu!bobg Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890 | (412) 268-6743 | Sinners can repent, but stupid is forever[src]
Episodes (was Re: Did Episode 1 Stink, or What?) raveling@unify.com (Paul Raveling) 1990-10-09 12:22
In article <39729@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>, v22964qs@ubvmsd.cc.buffalo.edu (Mike Cluff) writes: >> > >bmay@chips.com (Brad May) writes: >>> > >>Is is just me, or is anybody else very dissapointed in Episode 1 (10-6)? For the record, 10-6 was episode 2 of this season, formally numbered 2002 -- season 2, episode 2. Numbering for the show as a whole is this: Original pilot:Unnumbered rest of 1st season:1001 through 1007 2nd season:2001 through 2013 [...?] 2001 was the 2-hour opener that aired on Sept. 30. 2002 (episode 2) was the last one shown 2003 (episode 3) is next 2013 is the last episode that ABC has committed to at this time. A full season would run 22 episodes. At this point they're shooting 2009 or 2010, and ABC needs to place script orders within about 2 weeks if they're going to extend past 13 episodes. Unless they do that, the company will shut down, and ABC would then have to pay startup costs to resume production. BTW, Scott Frost says episode 3 has some really choice humor. We'll just have to stay tuned to see what it is. He also wasn't sure exactly what Little Lynch said in French, but thought it was the variant that translates to "I have a solitary soul", or something to that effect. ------------------ Paul Raveling Raveling@Unify.com[src]
Re: She's baaack (catherine) hargrove@bee.corp.sgi.com (Mark Hargrove) 1990-10-09 12:22
In article <1158600092@cdp> ddulmage@cdp.UUCP writes: Hi, after last night show, our local Mpls. PBS station ran a live special on T.P. They had Mark Frost live by sat. from L.A. Onew of the interviewers asked about Piper Laurie (as she has been doing some work in this area) and Frost replied that Catherine will def. be back in the future. [...] ...of course, this doesn't mean she's not dead.... :-)[src]
Laura and Drugs, was Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? twain@blake.u.washington.edu (Barbara Hlavin) 1990-10-09 12:23
In article <1157@bbxsda.UUCP> scott@bbxsda.UUCP (Scott Amspoker) writes: D > > > >Perhaps Laura's drug use was so severe that she couldn't function in > >her capacity as "hospitality girl". > > Well, maybe, but if her drug use was so out of control how was she managing to deceive everyone she dealt with on a daily basis and function as a high school student, a daughter, a volunteer? Everyone except her closest friends seem to be oblivious to the fact that Laura abused drugs: Dr. Hayward, Laura's parents, Norma as Laura's Meals on Wheels supervisor (I think). --Barbara -- Barbara HlavinMoab is my wash-pot; over Edom twain@blake.acs.washington.eduwill I cast out my shoe; Philistia, U Washington JC-21/Seattle 98105be thou glad of me.[src]
Re: TP: Confusion about Mill ledgers bmay@chips.com (Brad May) 1990-10-09 12:27
In article <Ab4FSwW00Vsn85zVB3@andrew.cmu.edu> bobg+@andrew.cmu.edu (Robert Steven Glickstein) writes: > >Could someone explain to me what's going on with the Mill ledgers? > >Ben says that the real one "masterminded by Catherine" shows the Mill > >sliding into bankruptcy. The fake one, according to Ben, shows the > >Mill turning a healthy profit. My understanding is that Catherine has been embezzling money from the mill for some time now; that's the "masterminded by Catherine" part. In the meantime, she has a fake set of books that show the mill making a profit to keep Josie from getting suspicious. After they burn the mill down, they produce the real set of books showing the mill going bankrupt to make it look like the Josie burned the mill down to get the insurance money. Maybe they would even make sure Josie had the fake books in her possesion to give to the insurance company. They could then produce the real books (and of course point out where the fake books were faked, since they know where to look 8^) ), to insure Josie is sent to jail for fraud.[src]
SPARC tp sounds made available via anonymous ftp long-morrow@cs.yale.edu (H. Morrow Long) 1990-10-09 12:29
I have made 4 sound files for the SparcStation available on dept.cs.yale.edu for anonymous ftp (in ~ftp/pub/SparcSounds/Twin_Peaks: choc.au out.au pies.au smilebag.au Thanks to Steven Slade for capturing choc.au and pies.au on the Mac. They and out.au and smilebag.au (posted by Doug Dulmage in 1158600079@cdp) were converted from MAC sounds. I made them avail via ftp rather than contribute to usenet traffic. If you have mac sounds you can convert them to sun sparc audio files with the sound2sun program (in dept.cs.yale.edu:~ftp/pub/SparcSounds/sound.shar). Is there an ftp site with the other mac sound bites that were posted? .....now I only need an Y/C NTSC color frame grabber to make some GIF files........ Dear Diary, broccoli for dinner again. I hate broccoli. Does this mean I'll never grow up? - George -- H. Morrow Long Manager of Development Yale Univ. Comp Sci Dept. Computing Facility Mail Stop 2158,UUCP: yale!Long-Morrow Yale Station,ARPA: Long-Morrow@CS.Yale.EDU New Haven, CT 06520BITNET: Long-Morrow@YaleCS.BITNET (203)-432-1254FAX:(203)-432-0593[src]
Re: Does Lynch read this newsgroup? robertj@Autodesk.COM (Young Rob Jellinghaus) 1990-10-09 13:13
In article <1990Oct8.210108.8489@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> ceblair@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (Charles Blair) writes:
> > Why is Ben's ownership of One-Eyed Jack's supposed to be such a big
> >secret. Einar Thorson knows, and he doesn't seem the embodiment of discretion.
What makes you think Einar knows? Einar may be under the impression that
OEJ's is Ben's favorite play spot, and that Ben _knows_ the owner.
> >Charles Blair
-- Rob Jellinghaus | "Next time you see a lie being spread or Autodesk, Inc. | a bad decision being made out of sheer robertj@Autodesk.COM | ignorance, pause, and think of hypertext." {decwrl,uunet}!autodesk!robertj | -- K. Eric Drexler, _Engines of Creation_
[src]
Philip K. Dick parallels in Twin Peaks james@twg.com (James Marshall) 1990-10-09 13:43
OK, I thought surely someone would point this out before me, but it hasn't happened. Doesn't the whole bit of getting messages in dreams from outer space aliens kind of reek of ALL of Philip K. Dick's later works? I mean, that seemed to be his whole theme near the end. Does anyone else feel this way? (Has anyone else read Philip K. Dick?) -James[src]
TWIN PEAKS: Where is Seattle? phz@cadence.com (Pete Zakel) 1990-10-09 13:46
Some people were earlier speculating on the location of Seattle. Well, if
we assume that Lynch and Frost are keeping cities that coexist in both the
Twin Peaks world and our world in the same location, then Seattle is
almost equidistant between the Northern and Southern borders and about a
quarter of the way in from the Western border. I'd call it "west central",
myself.
Approximate ASCI map of Washington State below.
North British Columbia (Canada)
|\
| -----------------------------------------------------.-----
| \ Twin *|
| Peaks | I
\ | d
_ | | a
|\__ | | h
/ --___ | | o
| ---_ | WASHINGTON |
\ \ / |
| | | Spokane * |
| | |* Seattle |
| | | |
\ | / |
| \_/* Tacoma |
| |
\ |
| |
| * Yakima |
| |
| |
| * Tri-cities |
|_-_ \
| ________---------------------`
\ ____ ----____-------
`----___---
Oregon
-Pete Zakel
(phz@cadence.com or ..!{hpda,versatc,apollo,ucbcad,uunet}!cadence!phz)
"I don't introduce my log."
[src]
Ronette's Vision tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff) 1990-10-09 13:48
Well I freeze framed Ronette's vision again this morning, repeatedly. A few observations and questions: * The >only< place where it looks like Killer Bob (KB) might be wearing cuffs is in the very first establishing shot of KB kneeling by LP in the train car. There could be something thin linking his wrists as he holds them in his lap and looks up at the camera [at Ronette?]. The rest of the time it really doesn't look like he's in cuffs or anything. But neither is there a knife -- just his fists. * Nevertheless it does NOT look like KB is trying to kill Laura. I get the impression he's trying to save her. Either with crude CPR, or with exorcism! Laura looks positively demonic -- possessed. When Bob realizes she's gone, his look seems to be one of powerful sorrow and the roar is one of rage. There's no glee. * We see Laura on the floor; and separately, we see Bob slamming something. We never actually see Bob slamming Laura. Is he doing something else? * Bob running "at ya" could be in pursuit of the killer, or something else. It certainly looks scary but we don't know what it means. * What IS that blinking light in the railroad car supposed to be? It's certainly atmospheric but where does it come from. Nothing in the exterior shot suggests a source. * I must agree that that corset shows a little more than we're accustomed to in network prime time. One assumes the director felt nobody would be looking THAT closely, at least not in Standards & Practices. The poster who thought he saw, um, Trafalgar Square, either had a very vivid imagination or is 100% right and ABC gets some kind of award -- I can't decide which. :-) * Freeze frame junkies alert: After the slow pan down Laura's body, when we come up to Bob crouching by her side, his hand is ON something. WHAT is it on? I can't make it out. -- To exit -- [__] Tom Neff press <Enter>. [__] tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM[src]
Re: Boyle's smoking clarson@ux.acs.umn.edu (Chaz Larson) 1990-10-09 14:00
In article <956@sppy00.UUCP> www@sppy00.UUCP (Victor Shakapopolis) writes: > >In article <8603@milton.u.washington.edu> howells@earth.arc.nasa.gov writes: > > > >}Oh come on! Absolutely ridiculous! > > > >What's ridiculous about it? > > > >That "Boyle smokes like a chimney and apparently would go bananas during > >shoots when she wasn't able to have a drag while doing a scene"? > > > >Well I can buy this. Being an ex-heavy-smoker I can see how Boyle would > >be bothered by not being allowed to smoke during a scene. I'm certain > >that acting is stressful, particularly TV acting with all of its' time > >and budget constraints (few retakes). Boyle probably was going nuts. Oh, come on. What is the longest single shot Donna [or any other character] appears in in any given episode? Let's guess way high and say 3 minutes. Now, a large percentage of those 3-minute shots will be accompanied by at least 15, if not 30-45 minutes of fussing around with lights, cameras, and the like. Let's assume that the TP crew really has their stuff together, and that it only takes them 15 minutes to set up between shots. Boyle is then prohibited from smoking for a three-minute period every fifteen minutes. In reality, it would be more like three minutes every half-hour. If Boyle is in fact _such_ a heavy smoker that she can't abide this, how did she get through college? Has she ever done stage acting? If so, she must insist that every role she plays on the stage be rewritten to allow smoking. The idea that Boyle's smoking _required_ this alteration in Donna's character is ridiculous. > >Or "Donna's cigarette smoking was done to accomodate her [Boyle], on top > >of showing something weird happening with Donna"? > > > >What's the problem with accomadating the actress since it fits so well > >with Donna's weirdness? Even if the writers hadn't originally intended > >that smoking being evidence of Donna's personality change it works so why > >not accomidate Boyle? Assuming that the writers didn't make the change of their own free will, this would seem reasonable. However, I find the theory that the TP producers were forced to make changes in the character of Donna to "accommodate" Boyle's sad addiction to nicotine preposterous. Boyle doesn't have that kind of power. Maybe Jack Nicholson could get a shooting schedule disrupted because he didn't want to miss a Laker game, or a script rewritten because he couldn't go without an hourly haircut, but not Boyle. If she really has _that_ bad a nicotine addiction, I really believe we would have seen a new actress portraying Donna this season. chaz. -- -- "I Am The Reincarnation of Abraham Lincoln", Insists Prince. -spew clarson@ux.acs.umn.edu AOL:Crowbone[src]
Re: Enterprise to Star Fleet Command phz@cadence.com (Pete Zakel) 1990-10-09 14:00
patl@athena.mit.edu (Patrick J. LoPresti) writes:
> >Entering the realm of sci-fi is fine, as long as it's GOOD sci-fi. The
> >"message from outer space" scene, with Cooper's awe-struck "Oh, my God"
> >could have come from any bad B movie.
Huh? Exactly why do you assume the message comes from outer space?
Do you assume that because the Margaret can hear her log that dead wood has
a soul? The message came form a computer that was connected to a radio
receiver that happened to be pointed up. The message could have originated
from 2 feet above the receiver, from within the receiver, or even from
within the computer.
I don't think TP is sci-fi at all, TP is fantasy. And it *IS* good fantasy.
Actually, by television standards it is *GREAT* fantasy.
It is at the same time a GREAT spoof on the soap-opera genre. It is also,
in my humble opinion, Art. As opposed to most TV fare, which is Schlock.
-Pete Zakel
(phz@cadence.com or ..!{hpda,versatc,apollo,ucbcad,uunet}!cadence!phz)
"Do you understand the message?"
"Yes, as a matter of fact, I do."
[src]